Hillson et al v. Kelly Services, Inc.
Filing
37
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 36 Stipulation to Continue the Case Management Conference.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Gerald L. Maatman, Jr. (pro hac vice pending)
gmaatman@seyfarth.com
Pamela Q. Devata (pro hac vice pending)
pdevata@seyfarth.com
131 South Dearborn Street, Suite 2400
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Telephone: (312) 460-5882
Facsimile: (312) 460-7882
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Laura J. Maechtlen (SBN 224923)
lmaechtlen@seyfarth.com
560 Mission Street, 31st Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 397-2823
Facsimile: (415) 397-8549
Attorneys for Defendant
KELLY SERVICES, INC.
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
LASANDRA HILLSON, STEVEN BOHLER, ) Case No. 3:14-cv-03256-VC
and ASHLEY SCHMIDT, individually and as )
representatives of the class,
) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
) ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE
Plaintiffs,
) MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
)
v.
) Judge:
Honorable Vince Chhabria
) Dept.:
4
KELLY SERVICES, INC.,
)
) First Amended Complaint Filed:
Defendant.
) August 19, 2014
)
)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-03256-VC
18187804v.1
1
2
3
4
5
6
STIPULATION
WHEREAS Defendant recently identified documents executed between the Parties that may
affect the venue for this action;
WHEREAS Counsel are meeting-and-conferring regarding the issue of venue, and may soon
reach agreement to transfer this action to the Eastern District of Michigan;
WHEREAS the resources of this Court and the Parties are better conserved by allowing the
7
Parties to continue to meet-and-confer and attempt to reach agreement on venue prior to having a
8
Case Management Conference before this Court;
9
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, the Parties are stipulating to continue the
10
Case Management Conference in this action currently scheduled for October 21, 2014 to October 28,
11
2014, at 10:00 a.m., and the associated deadlines for filing a Joint Case Management Conference
12
Statement and Initial Disclosures from October 14, 2014, to October 21, 2014. In support of this
13
Stipulation, and pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, the Parties concurrently submit the Declaration of Laura
14
J. Maechtlen.
15
16
Stipulated and respectfully submitted,
DATED: October 14, 2014
NICHOLS KASTER, LLP
17
18
By:
19
20
/s/ Daniel C. Bryden
Daniel C. Bryden (pro hac vice)
Matthew C. Helland
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
LASANDRA HILLSON, STEVEN BOHLER, and
ASHLEY SCHMIDT, individually and as
representatives of a class
21
22
23
DATED: October 14, 2014
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
24
By:
25
26
/s/ Laura J. Maechtlen
Gerald L. Maatman, Jr. (pro hac vice forthcoming)
Pamela Q. Devata (pro hac vice forthcoming)
Laura J. Maechtlen
27
Attorneys for Defendant
KELLY SERVICES, INC.
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-03256-VC
18187804v.1
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
2
3
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Date: October 15, 2014
Hon. Vince Chhabria
6
7
8
CONSENT TO ELECTRONIC FILING
9
10
11
Pursuant to General Order 45, paragraph X.B., I hereby attest that Daniel C. Bryden, a
registered ECF user whose user ID and password will not be utilized in the filing of the Stipulation
and [Proposed] Order to Continue Case Management Conference, concurred in the filing.
12
DATED: October 14, 2014
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
13
14
By:
15
16
17
/s/ Laura J. Maechtlen
Gerald L. Maatman, Jr. (pro hac vice pending)
Pamela Q. Devata (pro hac vice pending)
Laura J. Maechtlen
Attorneys for Defendant
KELLY SERVICES, INC.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-03256-VC
18187804v.1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Gerald L. Maatman, Jr. (pro hac vice pending)
gmaatman@seyfarth.com
Pamela Q. Devata (pro hac vice pending)
pdevata@seyfarth.com
131 South Dearborn Street, Suite 2400
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Telephone: (312) 460-5882
Facsimile: (312) 460-7882
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Laura J. Maechtlen (SBN 224923)
lmaechtlen@seyfarth.com
560 Mission Street, 31st Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 397-2823
Facsimile: (415) 397-8549
Attorneys for Defendant
KELLY SERVICES, INC.
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
LASANDRA HILLSON, STEVEN BOHLER, ) Case No. 3:14-cv-03256-VC
and ASHLEY SCHMIDT, individually and as )
representatives of the class,
) DECLARATION OF LAURA J.
) MAECHTLEN IN SUPPORT OF
Plaintiffs,
) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
) ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE
v.
) MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
)
KELLY SERVICES, INC.,
) Judge:
Honorable Vince Chhabria
) Dept.:
4
Defendant.
)
) First Amended Complaint Filed:
) August 19, 2014
)
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MAECHTLEN DEC ISO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-03256-VC
18188080v.1
1
I, Laura J. Maechtlen, declare:
2
1.
I am an attorney licensed to practice before the courts of the State of California. I am
3
a partner in the law firm of Seyfarth Shaw LLP, attorneys of record for Defendant Kelly Services,
4
Inc. (“Defendant” or “Kelly”). I make this declaration in support of the Parties’ Stipulation to
5
Continue Case Management Conference. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this
6
declaration, and if called as a witness, I could and would testify to the truth of these facts.
7
2.
On Friday, October 10, 2014, in preparation for the upcoming Case Management
8
Conference and in anticipation of discovery in this matter, my team discovered documents executed
9
between the Plaintiffs and Defendant regarding a choice of forum provision. This provision would
10
require “any dispute[]” between the Plaintiffs and Defendant to “be brought only in the State of
11
Michigan Courts of appropriate venue, or the United States District Court sitting in Michigan,” and
12
provides the signatory’s “consent to and submi[ssion] . . . to the jurisdiction of such Courts.” We
13
have found executed copies of these documents for two of the three named Plaintiffs, and believe a
14
copy also exists for the third named Plaintiff, and are searching for that document now.
15
3.
On Monday, October 13, 2014, I informed Michelle Drake, counsel for Plaintiffs, that
16
we had found these documents and believed Defendant has a basis to seek transfer to the Eastern
17
District of Michigan.
18
19
20
21
22
4.
Counsel for Plaintiffs and I agreed that we should continue to meet-and-confer on this
issue to determine whether the Parties can stipulate to a transfer to the Eastern District of Michigan.
5.
The Parties anticipate that they will be able to determine within one week whether
they will agree to transfer the action, or if there will be motion practice on this issue.
6.
Because there is a possibility that the Parties may agree to transfer this action to the
23
Eastern District of Michigan, the Parties believe that their resources, as well as the resources of this
24
Court, are better conserved by continuing by one week the upcoming Case Management Conference
25
currently scheduled for October 21, 2014, and the associated deadlines for a Joint Case Management
26
Conference Statement and Initial Disclosures, currently due on October 14, 2014.
27
28
2
MAECHTLEN DEC ISO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-03256-VC
18188080v.1
1
2
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of California that the foregoing is
true and correct. Executed on October 14, 2014 in San Francisco, California.
3
4
DATED: October 14, 2014
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
5
6
By:
7
8
/s/ Laura J. Maechtlen
Gerald L. Maatman, Jr. (pro hac vice pending)
Pamela Q. Devata (pro hac vice pending)
Laura J. Maechtlen
Attorneys for Defendant
KELLY SERVICES, INC.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
MAECHTLEN DEC ISO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-03256-VC
18188080v.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?