Bird v. KKMI Sausalito, LLC et al

Filing 99

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 98 Stipulation of Dismissal of Action with Prejudice. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

COX, WOOTTON, LERNER,
GRIFFIN & HANSEN, LLP
Mitchell S. Griffin (SBN 114881)
[e-mail]
900 Front Street, Suite 350
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone No.: 415-438-4600
Facsimile No.: 415-438-4601
Attorneys for Defendant
KEEFE KAPLAN MARITIME, INC.
Isaac Ruiz
Gabriel E. Verdugo (pro hac vice forthcoming)
Kathryn M. Knudsen
KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P.
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200
Seattle, Washington 98101-3052
[phone], Fax [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JAMES BIRD

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18

JAMES BIRD,
Plaintiff,

19
20
21
22
23
COX, WOOTTON,
LERNER, GRIFFIN &
HANSEN, LLP

24

900 FRONT STREET, SUITE 350
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
94111
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

v.
KEEFE KAPLAN MARITIME,
INC.; ERIC KOSTER, DBA J&H
MARINE, A SOLE
PROPRIETORSHIP,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: CV-14-03277 MEJ
STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL OF ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE

25
26
27
28

This case having been fully compromised and settled, Plaintiff James
Bird (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant KEEFE KAPLAN MARITIME, INC.
(“KKMI”) hereby stipulate, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Case No. C14-03277-MEJ

1
2
3
4

Procedure, and request the Court to order that this action, including all claims
and counterclaims, be fully dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its
own fees and costs.
SO STIPULATED.

5
6

Dated: July 5, 2016

COX, WOOTTON, LERNER,
GRIFFIN & HANSEN, LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
KEEFE KAPLAN MARITIME, INC.

7
8
9

By: /s/
Mitchell S. Griffin

10
11

Dated: July 5, 2016

KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JAMES BIRD

12
13
14

By: /s/
Isaac Ruiz

15
16
17
18

Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.1, this ECF filer hereby attests that
concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from the other
Signatory, which shall serve in lieu of his signature on the document.

19
20
21
22
23
COX, WOOTTON,
LERNER, GRIFFIN &
HANSEN, LLP

25

Pursuant to the above stipulation of the parties, this action, including all
claims and counterclaims, is fully dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear
its own costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

900 FRONT STREET, SUITE 350
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
94111
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Dated:

July 8, 2016

___________________________
Maria-Elena James
United States Magistrate Judge

26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Case No. C14-03277-MEJ