Rebucas et al v. City of San Bruno et al
Filing
108
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/23/2017. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2017)
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
Telephone: (510) 839-5200
The Law Offices of John L. Burris
1 JOHN L. BURRIS ESQ., SBN 69888
DEWITT M. LACY, ESQ., SBN 258789
2 K. CHIKE ODIWE, ESQ., SBN 315109
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
3 Airport Corporate Centre
4 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
5 Telephone: (510) 839-5200
Facsimile: (510) 839-3882
6 john.burris@johnburrislaw.com
dewitt.lacy@johnburrislaw.com
7
chike.odiwe@johnburrislaw.com
8
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13 ANNE REBUCAS, et al.,
14
Plaintiffs,
15 v.
16 CITY OF SAN BRUNO, et al.,
17
CASE NO.: 14-cv-03313-EMC
STIPULATION AND [Proposed]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Defendants.
18
19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES, through their
20 attorneys of record:
21
22
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties, by and through
their attorneys of record, stipulate that the entire action including all claims against all
23
defendants shall be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and fees. The
24
25
parties have fully executed the terms of a Release Agreement and dismissal should be granted
26 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2).
27
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE- 1
1 SO STIPULATED.
2
3 DATED: 10/17/2017
4
5
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
By:
6
7
/s/ DeWitt M. Lacy_____________
JOHN L. BURRIS, ESQ.
DEWITT M. LACY, ESQ.
K. CHIKE ODIWE, ESQ.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
8
10 DATED: 10/17/2017
HOWARD ROME MARTIN & RIDLEY LLP
11
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
Telephone: (510) 839-5200
The Law Offices of John L. Burris
9
12
13
14
By: * /s/ _Shawn Michael Ridley_________
TODD HOLTON MASTER, ESQ.
SHAWN MICHAEL RIDLEY, ESQ.
Attorneys for Defendants
* Mr. Ridley has given his consent to
file this document electronically.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE- 2
ORDER
1
2 IS IT HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants City of San Bruno and DOES 1-25 are dismissed
3 with prejudice from this action, that the entire action is dismissed with prejudice with each party
4
to bear its own costs and fees.
5
6
7
October 23, 2017
8 Dated:
__________________________________
HONORABLE EDWARD CHEN
10
11
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
Telephone: (510) 839-5200
The Law Offices of John L. Burris
9
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE- 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?