Castillo-Antonio v. Barron et al

Filing 25

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 9/29/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 9/10/2015. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

Northern District of California

10

San Francisco Division
JOSE DANIEL CASTILLO-ANTONIO,

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

Plaintiff,

No. 3:14-cv-03320-LB
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.
13
14

CUAUHTEMOC BARRON, MOHAMMED
VAHDATPOUR, CHRISTINE
VAHDATPOUR, and DOES 1-50, et al.,

15
16

Defendants.
_____________________________________/

17

This is an ADA case that is subject to the case-management deadlines set forth in this district’s

18

General Order 56. The plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint on April 6, 2015. The plaintiff

19

filed a proof of service, but no defendant has appeared (except that one defendant acknowledged

20

service). Nothing on the docket suggests any activity that is required by General Order 56 (such as a

21

joint site inspection or a “Notice of Need for Mediation”). (See General Order 56 ¶¶ 3, 6.) Under the

22

circumstances, the court orders the plaintiff to show cause in writing by September 29, 2015 why

23

this action should not dismissed without prejudice for his failure to prosecute it. The response must

24

include any request for a change in the scheduling order at ECF No. 4 and include the plaintiff’s

25

plan for proceeding in the case.

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27

Dated: September 10, 2015

28

No. 3:14-cv-03320-LB
ORDER

_______________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge