Silas-Foreman v. Colvin

Filing 26

ORDER FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE SEPARATE STATEMENT OF FACTS. Deadline for Plaintiff's Reply is continued to 5/7/2015. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 4/17/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2015)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 JAYLEON J SILAS-FOREMAN, Case No. 14-cv-03340-MEJ Plaintiff, 5 ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S STATEMENT OF FACTS v. 6 7 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Defendant. 8 9 On October 1, 2014, the Court ordered the parties to file either a joint statement or separate 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 statements of facts setting forth all relevant medical evidence and written and oral testimony in the 12 Administrative Record. Dkt. No. 12. If the parties were unable to agree on a joint statement of 13 facts, the Court directed Plaintiff to file a statement, separate from the motion and memorandum 14 of law, setting forth each fact from the Administrative Record on which Plaintiff relies in support 15 of the motion. Defendant was then ordered, when filing the cross-motion for summary judgment 16 to file a statement setting forth: (a) for each paragraph of Plaintiff’s separate statement of facts, a 17 correspondingly numbered paragraph indicating whether Defendant disputes the statement of fact 18 as set forth by Plaintiff and, if disputed, a reference to the specific portion of the record supporting 19 Defendant’s position; and (b) any additional facts from the Administrative Record on which 20 Defendant relies in support of the motion. Defendant failed to file a separate statement. 21 22 23 Accordingly, Defendant is ORDERED to file the separate statement of facts by April 23, 2015. The deadline for Plaintiff’s reply is CONTINUED to May 7, 2015. IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: April 17, 2015 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?