Silas-Foreman v. Colvin
Filing
26
ORDER FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE SEPARATE STATEMENT OF FACTS. Deadline for Plaintiff's Reply is continued to 5/7/2015. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 4/17/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2015)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
JAYLEON J SILAS-FOREMAN,
Case No. 14-cv-03340-MEJ
Plaintiff,
5
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S
STATEMENT OF FACTS
v.
6
7
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Defendant.
8
9
On October 1, 2014, the Court ordered the parties to file either a joint statement or separate
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
statements of facts setting forth all relevant medical evidence and written and oral testimony in the
12
Administrative Record. Dkt. No. 12. If the parties were unable to agree on a joint statement of
13
facts, the Court directed Plaintiff to file a statement, separate from the motion and memorandum
14
of law, setting forth each fact from the Administrative Record on which Plaintiff relies in support
15
of the motion. Defendant was then ordered, when filing the cross-motion for summary judgment
16
to file a statement setting forth: (a) for each paragraph of Plaintiff’s separate statement of facts, a
17
correspondingly numbered paragraph indicating whether Defendant disputes the statement of fact
18
as set forth by Plaintiff and, if disputed, a reference to the specific portion of the record supporting
19
Defendant’s position; and (b) any additional facts from the Administrative Record on which
20
Defendant relies in support of the motion. Defendant failed to file a separate statement.
21
22
23
Accordingly, Defendant is ORDERED to file the separate statement of facts by April 23,
2015. The deadline for Plaintiff’s reply is CONTINUED to May 7, 2015.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: April 17, 2015
______________________________________
MARIA-ELENA JAMES
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?