iLife Technologies Inc v. AliphCom

Filing 106

REVISED STIPULATED PROPOSED CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/15/2015. Order spread from Case No. 3:14cv338, Dkt. 67,entered 02/03/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

DURIE TANGRI LLP
CLEMENT S. ROBERTS (SBN 209203)
[e-mail]
SONALI D. MAITRA (SBN 254896)
[e-mail]
TIMOTHY C. SAULSBURY (SBN 281434)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL A. FELDMAN (SBN 295780)
[e-mail]
217 Leidesdorff Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
415-236-6300
Attorneys for Defendant
FITBIT, INC.

10
11

MUNCK WILSON MANDALA, LLP
Michael C. Wilson (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
S. Wallace Dunwoody (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
12770 Coit Road, Suite 600
Dallas, Texas 75251
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
FREITAS ANGELL & WEINBERG LLP
Robert E. Freitas (CA Bar No. 80948)
[e-mail]
Daniel J. Weinberg (CA Bar No. 227159)
[e-mail]
Jessica N. Leal (CA Bar No. 267232)
[e-mail]
350 Marine Parkway, Suite 200
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
ILIFE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

12
13
14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17

ILIFE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

18
19
20
21

Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 3:14-cv-03338-WHO
REVISED STIPULATED PROPOSED CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
Ctrm: 2 - 17th Floor
Judge: Honorable William H. Orrick

FITBIT, INC.,
Defendant.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
REVISED STIPULATED CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE / Case No. 3:14-cv-03338-WHO

1
2

Pursuant to the Revised Scheduling Order [Doc. 85] entered in related case iLife Technologies,

3

Inc. v. Aliphcom d/b/a Jawbone, 3:14-cv-03345-WHO, in which the Court encouraged Plaintiff to confer

4

with Fitbit, Inc. regarding scheduling to the extent the interests of efficiency and costs warranted

5

coordination with Case No. 3:14-cv-03345-WHO, Plaintiff iLife Technologies, Inc. and Fitbit, Inc. (“the

6

Parties”) respectfully submit this Revised Stipulated Proposed Litigation Schedule, which places both of

7

the related actions on the same claim construction briefing and hearing schedule, as follows:

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Event
Pat. L.R. 4-3 (Joint Claim Construction Prehearing
Statement)
Pat. L.R. 4-5(a) (Plaintiff’s opening claim construction
brief)
Pat. L.R. 4-5(b) (Defendant’s responsive claim
construction brief)
Pat. L.R. 4-5(c) (Plaintiff’s reply claim construction brief)
Technology Tutorial
Pat. L.R. 4-6 Claim Construction Hearing

Proposed Deadline
March 4, 2015
March 15, 2015
April 8, 2015
April 22, 2015
May 1, 2015 at 9 a.m.
May 8, 2015 at 9 a.m.

15

The Parties are conferring regarding the extent to which unifying post-Markman hearing deadlines with

16

those in the related case would promote efficiency and costs, and they expect to submit a stipulation

17

regarding those deadlines in the near future.

18
19

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Dated: January 15, 2015
By: /s/ S. Wallace Dunwoody
Michael C. Wilson (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
S. Wallace Dunwoody (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
MUNCK WILSON MANDALA, LLP
12770 Coit Road, Suite 600
Dallas, Texas 75251
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

28
1
REVISED STIPULATED CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE / Case No. 3:14-cv-03338-WHO

1

Robert E. Freitas
FREITAS ANGELL & WEINBERG LLP
350 Marine Parkway, Suite 200
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

2
3
4
5
6

Dated: January 15, 2015

By: /s/ Clement S. Roberts
Clement S. Roberts
[e-mail]
Sonali D. Maitra
[e-mail]
Timothy C. Saulsbury
[e-mail]
Michael A. Feldman
[e-mail]
DURIE TANGRI LLP
217 Leidesdorff Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
415-236-6300

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
FITBIT, INC.

15
16
17

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF,
ILIFE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

FILER’S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I, Clement S. Roberts, attest that

18

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.

19

Dated: January 15, 2015

20

/s/ Clement S. Roberts
Clement S. Roberts

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
The above REVISED STIPULATED PROPOSED CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE is
approved and all parties shall comply with its provisions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
February 3, 2015
Dated: _____________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK

28
2

REVISED STIPULATED CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-03338-WHO