iLife Technologies Inc v. AliphCom

Filing 65

ORDER RE PRO HAC VICE FORM, Motions terminated: 60 , 62 Motion re Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Alsup on October 8, 2014. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

ILIFE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
No. C 14-03345 WHA

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

Plaintiff,
v.
ALIPHCOM d/b/a JAWBONE,

13

ORDER RE PRO HAC VICE
FORM

Defendant.
/

14
15

The pro hac vice applications of Attorney Phillip Morton (Dkt. Nos. 60, 62) are DENIED

16

for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that

17

“he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the

18

highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar.” Filling out the

19

pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only identifies the state of bar

20

membership — such as “Commonwealth of Virginia” or “State of Virginia” — is inadequate

21

under the local rule because it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fee does

22

not need to be paid again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is

23

submitted.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: October 8, 2014.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE