Levin v. City and County of San Francisco

Filing 115

ORDER granting 111 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCOS MOTION FOR INDICATIVE RULING ON RULE 60(B) MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT filed by City and County of San Francisco . Set Deadlines as to 112 MOTION MOTION FOR INDICATIVE RULING ON RULE 60(B) MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT . Responses due by 9/18/2015. Replies due by 9/25/2015. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/31/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney WAYNE SNODGRASS, State Bar #148137 CHRISTINE VAN AKEN, State Bar #241755 Deputy City Attorneys 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place City Hall, Room 234 San Francisco, California 94102-4682 Telephone: (415) 554-4633 Facsimile: (415) 554-4699 E-Mail: christine.van.aken@sfgov.org Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 DANIEL LEVIN; MARIA LEVIN; PARK LANE ASSOCIATES, L.P.; THE SAN FRANCISCO APARTMENT ASSOCIATION; and THE COALITION FOR BETTER HOUSING, 15 Plaintiffs, 16 Case No. 14-cv-03352-CRB (JSC) STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO’S MOTION FOR INDICATIVE RULING ON RULE 60(B) MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT vs. Trial Date: 17 October 6, 2014 (facial challenges) CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 18 Defendant. 19 20 21 22 DAVID GREENE AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Defendants-Intervenors as to as-applied claims only. 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 14-cv-03352-CRB (JSC) c:\users\espino~1\appdata\local\temp\notes1a03dd\01042132.doc 1 Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-2, the parties to the facial challenge in this case stipulate and 2 seek an order of the Court setting a briefing schedule on the City and County of San Francisco’s 3 Motion for Indicative Ruling on Rule 60(b) Motion for Relief from Judgment. 4 The City will file its motion and supporting papers on or before August 28, 2015 and shall 5 notice the hearing on the motion for October 16, 2015. Plaintiffs shall file any opposition to the 6 motion no later than September 18, 2015. Plaintiffs’ counsel will be out of the country August 29 7 through September 7 and will be unavailable to file an opposition before then. The City shall file any 8 reply in support of the motion no later than September 25, 2015. 9 10 11 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: August 27, 2015 By: **/s/J. David Breemer J. David Breemer Attorney for Plaintiffs Dated: August 27, 2015 By: /s/Christine Van Aken Christine Van Aken Attorney for Defendant City & County of San Francisco 12 13 14 15 16 17 **Pursuant to GO 45, the electronic signatory has obtained approval from this signatory. 18 19 20 ORDER 21 22 23 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: AUGUST 31, 2015 HON. CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 14-cv-03352-CRB (JSC) 1 c:\users\espino~1\appdata\local\temp\notes1a03dd\01042132.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?