Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees et al v. Ventura Finishing Systems

Filing 40

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 39 Request for Extension of Time to File Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2015)

Download PDF
1 Michele Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509) Adrian L. Canzoneri, Esq. (SBN 265168) 2 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110 3 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 882-7900 4 Facsimile: (415) 882-9287 mstafford@sjlawcorp.com 5 acanzoneri@sjlawcorp.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 BAY AREA PAINTERS AND TAPERS PENSION TRUST FUND, et al., 11 Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 VENTURA FINISHING SYSTEMS, a 14 California Corporation, 15 Defendant. Case No.: C14-03364 - HSG REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; ORDER THEREON Current Deadline: Proposed Deadline: Judge: Courtroom: April 1, 2015 April 15, 2015 Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam 15 – 18th Floor 16 17 TO THE COURT: 18 Plaintiffs Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, et al. (“Plaintiffs”), by and 19 through their counsel, hereby respectfully request a two-week extension of time by which to file 20 Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment. GOOD CAUSE exists to grant the extension for the 21 following reasons: 22 1. As the Court records reflect, this matter came on for hearing for a scheduled Case 23 Management Conference before the Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam on March 18, 2015 in the 24 above-captioned Court. [Dkt. No. 38]. Adrian L. Canzoneri, Esq. appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs. 25 Justine Kastan, Esq., former counsel for Defendant, also appeared. There was no appearance by 26 Defendant. 27 2. At the March 18, 2015 Case Management Conference, the Court ordered Plaintiffs 28 to file their Motion for Default Judgment by April 1, 2015. [Id.]. -1PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Case No.: C14-03364-HSG C:\Users\RILEYN~1.CAN\AppData\Local\Temp\notes1A03DD\Request for Extension of Time to File MDJ_32515.doc 3. 1 However, on Monday, March 23, 2015, presumably after being advised by its 2 former counsel, Defendant contacted Plaintiffs’ counsel to discuss the amounts owed to Plaintiffs, 3 in addition to the documents needed by Plaintiffs to complete the audit of Defendant’s payroll 4 records. Defendant indicated his willingness to attempt to resolve this matter without the need for 5 further litigation. Plaintiffs’ counsel requested that Defendant submit the necessary additional 6 documents as soon as possible so that the complete and final amounts owed to Plaintiffs could be 7 ascertained. Accordingly, Plaintiffs are requesting the two-week extension herein. 4. 8 Upon review of the Honorable Judge Gilliam’s law and motion calendar and 9 scheduling notes, the first available hearing date for Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment is 10 June 4, 2015. Thus, neither the Court nor the parties to this matter will be significantly affected by 11 the requested two-week extension. 5. 12 As the parties are now currently engaged in discussions in an attempt to resolve this 13 matter without the need for further litigation, in the interest of judicial economy and efficiency, as 14 well as the preservation of the Court’s time and resources, Plaintiffs’ respectfully request that the 15 deadline to file the Motion for Default Judgment, currently set for April 1, 2015, be extended two 16 weeks, up to and including April 15, 2015. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 17 18 foregoing is true of my own knowledge and if called upon I could and would testify competently 19 thereto. Executed this 25th day of March 2015, at San Francisco, California. 20 21 /S/ Adrian L. Canzoneri 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Based on the foregoing, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the deadline for Plaintiffs to 24 25 26 27 28 file their Motion for Default Judgment shall be extended by a period of two weeks, up to and including April 15, 2015. Date: 3/26/2015 HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE -2- PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Case No.: C14-03364-HSG C:\Users\RILEYN~1.CAN\AppData\Local\Temp\notes1A03DD\Request for Extension of Time to File MDJ_32515.doc PROOF OF SERVICE 1 2 I, the undersigned, declare: 3 1. I am a citizen of the United States and am employed in the County of San 4 Francisco, State of California. My business address is 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110, San 5 Francisco, California 94104. 6 2. I am over the age of eighteen and not a party to this action. 7 3. On March 25, 2015, I served the following document(s): 8 9 PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 10 11 on the interested parties in said action by enclosing a true and exact copy of each document 12 in a sealed envelope and placing the envelope for collection and First Class mailing following our 13 ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this business’ practice for collecting and 14 processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for 15 collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States 16 Postal Service in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid. 17 18 19 20 21 4. The envelopes were addressed and mailed as follows: Ventura Finishing Systems 45278 Industrial Drive. Fremont, CA 94538 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on March 25, 2015, at San Francisco, California. 22 23 24 /S/ Alicia Rutkowski Paralegal Parale 25 26 27 28 -3- PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Case No.: C14-03364-HSG C:\Users\RILEYN~1.CAN\AppData\Local\Temp\notes1A03DD\Request for Extension of Time to File MDJ_32515.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?