Yolanda Ferreira v. Southwest Airlines Co. et al
Filing
50
ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: 49 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 5/11/2015. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Richard G. Grotch, Esq. – SBN 127713
Jonathan C. Harriman, Esq. – SBN 250943
CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH
A Professional Corporation, Lawyers
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 300
Redwood City, CA 94065-2133
Telephone: (650) 592-5400
Facsimile: (650) 592-5027
ATTORNEYS FOR Defendants
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO. and
AIRTRAN AIRWAYS, INC.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
YOLANDA FERREIRA and LAUREANO
FERREIRA,
12
13
14
15
Case No. C 14-3454 NC (MED)
STIPULATION FOR ORDER OF
DISMISSAL AND ORDER
OF DISMISSAL [FRCP 41(a)(1)]
Plaintiffs,
vs.
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO., AIR TRAN
AIRWAYS, INC. and DOES 1 -10, inclusive,
Defendants,
16
17
18
19
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiffs YOLANDA FERREIRA,
20
LAUREANO FERREIRA and defendants SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO. and AIRTRAN
21
AIRWAYS, INC., by their respective counsel of record, that all the claims of plaintiffs
22
YOLANDA FERREIRA and LAUREANO FERREIRA, be dismissed with prejudice
23
pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with each party to bear his,
24
her or its own attorneys’ fees and costs of suit.
25
///
26
27
///
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Case No: C 14-3454 NC (MED)
SO STIPULATED.
1
2
3
Dated: May 5, 2015
LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD SAX
/s/ Richard Sax
4
5
By:
6
7
8
9
Dated: May 9, 2015
Richard Sax
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Yolanda Ferreira
CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH
/s/ Richard G. Grotch
10
By:
11
12
13
Richard G. Grotch (*)
Attorneys for Defendants
Southwest Airlines Co. and
AirTran Airways, Inc.
14
15
16
17
(*)
I hereby attest that I have been authorized
to affix any signatures indicated by a
“conformed” signature (/s/) within
this e-filed document.
ORDER
18
19
Upon the parties’ stipulation,
20
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the claims of plaintiffs YOLANDA FERREIRA and
21
LAUREANO FERREIRA be, and hereby are, dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule
22
41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with each party to bear his, her or its own
ER
H
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Case No: C 14-3454 NC (MED)
RT
28
th
Judge Na
anael M.
Cousins
R NIA
NO
27
FO
26
__________________________________
Honorable Nathanael CousinsED
T
GRAN
United States Magistrate Judge
LI
Dated: May 11, 2015
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
UNIT
ED
25
S
attorneys’ fees and costs of suit.
RT
U
O
24
A
23
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?