Marlene Henderson et al v. County of Santa Cruz et al

Filing 126

ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge W on 12/2/2020. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2020)

Case 3:14-cv-03544-WHO Document 126 Filed 12/02/20 Page 1 of 1

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

MARLENE HENDERSON, et al.,

Case No. 14-cv-03544-WHO

Plaintiffs,
8
v.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON
SETTLEMENT

9
10

COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, et al.,

Re: Dkt. No. 125

Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15

The parties to the action, by and through their counsel, have advised the Court that they have
agreed to a settlement. The settlement was recently approved by the County of Santa Cruz Board of
Supervisors.

16
IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings

17
18
19

scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court,
with proper notice to opposing counsel within sixty (60) days from the date below, that settlement has

20

not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this cause shall be restored to the calendar for

21

further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: December 2, 2020
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge