Curry v. Yelp Inc. et al

Filing 28

ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING re 21 MOTION to Consolidate Cases MOTION to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel ; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof filed by City of Miami Fire Fighters' and Police Officers' Retirement Trust. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 4, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JOSEPH CURRY, Case No. 14-cv-03547-JST Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 YELP INC., et al., Defendants. ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING Re: ECF No. 21 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Before the Court is City of Miami Fire Fighters' and Police Officers’ Retirement Trust’s 14 Motion to Consolidate Cases and Appoint Lead Counsel. ECF No. 21. Pursuant to Federal Rule 15 of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds that the matter is suitable for 16 disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for November 17 13, 2014, is hereby VACATED. 18 However, if any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date 19 of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has 20 been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented 21 argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient 22 to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the 23 party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the 24 Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 4, 2014 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?