Curry v. Yelp Inc. et al

Filing 68

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 67 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Continuing the October 29, 2015 Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by Geoffrey Donaker, Yelp Inc., Robert J. Krolik, Jeremy Stoppelman. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 7, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 GILBERT R. SEROTA (SBN 75305) MARJORY GENTRY (SBN 240887) RYAN KEATS (SBN 296463) ARNOLD & PORTER LLP Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 471-3100 Facsimile: (415) 471-3400 Email: Gilbert.Serota@aporter.com Email: Marjory.Gentry@aporter.com Email: Ryan.Keats@aporter.com Attorneys for Defendants YELP INC., JEREMY STOPPELMAN, ROB KROLIK and GEOFFREY DONAKER 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 JOSEPH CURRY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 vs. YELP INC., JEREMY STOPPELMAN, ROB KROLIK and GEOFFREY DONAKER, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:14-cv-03547 CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE OCTOBER 29, 2015 HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 22 23 24 25 26 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03547 1 2 3 WHEREAS, on May 21, 2015, Plaintiffs’ filed their First Amended Class Action Complaint (Dkt. No. 55); WHEREAS, on May 28, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation and proposed order providing 4 for a briefing and hearing schedule that took into account scheduling conflicts of counsel, 5 personal medical issues and planned summer vacations (Dkt. No. 57); 6 WHEREAS, that proposed briefing and hearing schedule provided for the hearing on 7 Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss The First Amended Complaint to be set for September 15, 2015 8 at 2:00 p.m.; 9 10 11 WHEREAS, on May 29, 2015 the Court so-ordered the proposed briefing and hearing schedule (Dkt. No. 58); WHEREAS, on June 26, 2015, the Court, on its own motion, continued the hearing on 12 Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss the First Amended Complaint to October 1, 2015, due to a 13 change in its availability; 14 15 16 17 18 WHEREAS, Defendants’ counsel was unavailable on October 1, 2015, and, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court continued the hearing to October 22; WHEREAS, on September 29, the Court, on its own motion, rescheduled oral argument to October 29 (Dkt. No. 66); WHEREAS, October 29 presents a conflict for counsel who will be arguing the motion for 19 defendants, as he has a hearing scheduled in Alaska Superior Court in Anchorage and will be 20 unable to return in time for this hearing date; 21 WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and reviewed the court’s calendar as to its 22 availability and the calendars of counsel and clients who must be at the hearing, and have agreed 23 to propose to the Court the following potential hearing dates: November 10 or December 3. 24 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, SUBJECT 25 TO APPROVAL BY THIS COURT, by the parties through their respective counsel of record, 26 as follows: STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 35321271v1 CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03547 1. 1 2 3 4 5 at [ The hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss shall be re-set for [see above] ].; 2. The parties have not previously continued the last noticed hearing date on Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss the First Amended Complaint; and 3. The parties do not seek to continue this date for the purpose of delay. The 6 proposed new date will not have an effect on any pre-trial and trial dates as the Court has yet to 7 schedule these dates. 8 9 10 SO STIPULATED. DATED: October 7, 2015 /s/ Gilbert R. Serota GILBERT R. SEROTA Arnold & Porter LLP Counsel for Defendants DATED: October 7, 2015 /s/ Shawn Williams SHAWN WILLIAMS ROBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP Counsel for Plaintiff Joseph Curry 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 35321271v1 CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03547 1 2 Certificate Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) I, Gilbert R. Serota, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to 3 file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing The October 1, 2015 hearing on 4 Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss The First Amended Complaint To October 22, 2015. In 5 compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that counsel for defendants, Shawn A. 6 Williams concurs in this filing. 7 8 DATED: October 7, 2015 /s/ Gilbert R. Serota GILBERT R. SEROTA 9 10 * 11 * * ORDER 12 13 Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS 14 HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the First Amended 15 Complaint shall be re-calendared for November 10, 2015 at 9:30AM. 16 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 DATED: October 7, 2015 19 ________________________________________ THE HONORABLE. JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 35321271v1 CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03547

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?