Grossman v. Johnson & Johnson et al

Filing 22

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 17 Stipulation Changing the Case Management Conference Hearing Date.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 THOMAS SIMS (SBN 264174) tsims@baronbudd.com BARON & BUDD, P. C. 3102 Oak Lawn Ave, Suite 1100 Dallas, Texas 75219 Telephone: (214) 521-3605 Facsimile: (214) 520-1181 Attorneys for Plaintiff 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 MICHELLE A. CHILDERS (SBN 197064) michelle.childers@dbr.com MATTHEW J. ADLER (SBN 273147) matthew.adler@dbr.com DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2235 Telephone: (415) 591-7500 Facsimile: (415) 591-7510 Attorneys for Defendants Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and McKesson Corporation 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 KARYN JOY GROSSMAN 17 Plaintiff, 18 vs. 19 JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al. 20 Defendants 21 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 14-cv-03557-VC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 22 WHEREAS, on August 6, 2014, a Complaint was filed against Defendants; 23 WHEREAS, on August 11, 2014, an Initial Case Management Scheduling Order was 24 issued setting a Case Management Conference for November 4, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. 25 WHEREAS, on September 9, 2014, all Defendants filed an Answer to the Complaint. 26 WHEREAS, lead counsel for Plaintiff, Thomas Sims, is scheduled to be out of the 27 country from November 1, 2014 to November 11, 2014 and seeks to continue the Case 28 Management Conference so that he may appear in person. 1 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE S RT br ia A H ER e Chha FO NO inc J u d ge V R NIA DERED O OR IT IS S LI UNIT ED RT U O 29 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?