Glassey et al v. Microsemi Inc et al

Filing 78

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE CISCOS MOTION TO DISMISS. Response due October 24 at noon.. Signed by Judge Alsup on October 9, 2014. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2014)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9

TODD S. GLASSEY and MICHAEL E. MCNEIL,
Plaintiffs,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17

No. C 14-03629 WHA

v.
MICROSEMI INC, THE IETF AND ISOC, AND
THE US GOVERNMENT AND INDUSTRY
PARTNERS (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED
TO APPLE, CISCO, EBAY/PAYPAL, GOOGLE,
JUNIPER NETWORKS, MICROSOFT,
NETFLIX, AND ORACLE), USPTO ALJ PETER
CHEN ESQ., AND TWO INDIVIDUALS (MARK
HASTINGS AND ERIK VAN DER KAAY) AS
“NAMED DOES,”

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE
CISCO’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendants.
/

18
19

In September 2014, Cisco Systems, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss. No certificate of

20

service was appended to the motion. No opposition or response was timely filed. Accordingly,

21

by NOON ON OCTOBER 16, Cisco shall file a certificate of service. Pro se plaintiffs Todd

22

Glassey and Michael McNeil have until OCTOBER 24, 2014, AT NOON, to show cause why Cisco

23

should not be dismissed. Cisco’s motion may be granted if no response is timely filed.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 9, 2014.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE