Glassey et al v. Microsemi Inc et al

Filing 78

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE CISCOS MOTION TO DISMISS. Response due October 24 at noon.. Signed by Judge Alsup on October 9, 2014. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 TODD S. GLASSEY and MICHAEL E. MCNEIL, Plaintiffs, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 No. C 14-03629 WHA v. MICROSEMI INC, THE IETF AND ISOC, AND THE US GOVERNMENT AND INDUSTRY PARTNERS (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO APPLE, CISCO, EBAY/PAYPAL, GOOGLE, JUNIPER NETWORKS, MICROSOFT, NETFLIX, AND ORACLE), USPTO ALJ PETER CHEN ESQ., AND TWO INDIVIDUALS (MARK HASTINGS AND ERIK VAN DER KAAY) AS “NAMED DOES,” ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE CISCO’S MOTION TO DISMISS Defendants. / 18 19 In September 2014, Cisco Systems, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss. No certificate of 20 service was appended to the motion. No opposition or response was timely filed. Accordingly, 21 by NOON ON OCTOBER 16, Cisco shall file a certificate of service. Pro se plaintiffs Todd 22 Glassey and Michael McNeil have until OCTOBER 24, 2014, AT NOON, to show cause why Cisco 23 should not be dismissed. Cisco’s motion may be granted if no response is timely filed. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 9, 2014. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?