Rayford v. Blair et al
Filing
20
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria denying 16 Motion to Appoint Counsel.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
RAPHAEL GEORGE RAYFORD,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 14-cv-03660-VC (PR)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
v.
W. BLAIR, et al.,
Defendants.
Docket No. 16
12
13
14
15
16
Raphael George Rayford moves for the appointment of counsel in his civil rights action
because the legal issues are complex and he is unable to adequately investigate or present the
factual issues regarding his claims.
“[I]t is well-established that there is generally no constitutional right to counsel in civil
17
18
cases.” United States v. Sardone, 94 F.3d 1233, 1236 (9th Cir. 1996). Nonetheless, under
19
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), the Court has the discretion to appoint counsel to “any person unable to
20
afford counsel.” The discretionary appointment of counsel typically is reserved for cases involving
21
“exceptional circumstances.” Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991). “A finding
22
of exceptional circumstances requires an evaluation of both ‘the likelihood of success on the merits
23
and the ability of the petitioner to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal
24
25
26
27
28
issues involved.’ Neither of these factors is dispositive and both must be viewed together before
reaching a decision.” Id. Here, exceptional circumstances requiring the appointment of counsel are
not evident. The request for appointment of counsel is DENIED.
If, in the future, the Court concludes it is necessary to appoint counsel to represent
1
Rayford, it shall do so sua sponte.
2
This Order terminates Docket No. 16.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
Dated: June 11, 2015
________________________________
VINCE CHHABRIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
RAPHAEL GEORGE RAYFORD,
Case No. 14-cv-03660-VC
Plaintiff,
8
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
9
10
W. BLAIR, et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
That on June 11, 2015, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
18
19
20
Raphael George Rayford ID: D-76886
Salinas Valley State Prison
P.O. Box 1050, Fac.D1-111L
Soledad, CA 93960-1050
21
22
23
Dated: June 11, 2015
Richard W. Wieking
Clerk, United States District Court
24
25
26
27
By:________________________
Kristen Melen, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable VINCE CHHABRIA
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?