Bricklayers Local No. 3 Pension Trust and its Board of Trustees et al v. Cal-Tex Masonry

Filing 45

ORDER to Continue Standby Order of Dismissal. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 7/7/2016 01:30 PM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/2/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2016)

Download PDF
1 Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509) Erica J. Russell, Esq. (SBN 274494) 2 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110 3 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 882-7900 – Telephone 4 (415) 882-9287 – Facsimile mstafford@sjlawcorp.com 5 erussell@sjlawcorp.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Bricklayers Local No. 3 Pension Trust, et al. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRICKLAYERS LOCAL NO. 3 PENSION TRUST, et al. 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 CAL-TEX MASONRY, INC., a California 15 Corporation, 16 Defendant. Case No.: C14-3690 RS ORDER PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO STANDBY ORDER OF DISMISSAL (ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE) Date: Thursday, May 5, 2016 Time: 2:30 p.m. Ctrm: 3, 17th Floor 450 Golden Gate Ave. San Francisco, CA Judge: The Honorable Richard Seeborg 17 18 19 Plaintiffs Bricklayers Local No. 3 Pension Trust, et al. (“Plaintiffs”) hereby respectfully 20 submit their Response to Order to Show Cause (“Response”) pursuant to the Clerk’s April 6, 21 2016, Notice regarding the Standby Order of Dismissal Hearing scheduled for May 5, 2016. 22 As set forth in Plaintiffs’ Notice of Settlement, filed on July 20, 2015, Plaintiffs and 23 Defendant Cal-Tex Masonry, Inc. (“Defendant”) had reached a settlement in this matter, which 24 was conditioned upon Defendant’s compliance with the terms of its collective bargaining 25 agreement. Specifically, upon Defendant’s timely payment of contributions to Plaintiffs for a 26 period of twelve (12) consecutive months, beginning with the month of June 2015, Plaintiffs 27 agreed to waive the balance due by Defendant and to file a voluntary dismissal of this action. 28 Defendant immediately defaulted and failed to timely pay its June through September 2015 -1PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO STANDBY ORDER OF DISMISSAL (ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE) Case No.: C14-3690 RS P:\CLIENTS\BRICL\Cal Tex Masonry\Pleadings\Response to Order to Show Cause 042916.docx 1 contributions to Plaintiffs. Therefore, Defendant failed to meet the conditions necessary for 2 Plaintiffs to waive the balance owed by Defendant and dismiss this action. 3 In Plaintiffs’ Response to the Court’s Standby Order for Dismissal filed on January 4, 4 2016, Plaintiffs informed the Court that Defendant had failed to respond to several demands for 5 payment of the amounts owed to Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs had also offered Defendant a payment plan 6 if it could not pay the balance due in full. Plaintiffs advised the Court that if Defendant failed to 7 respond to their most recent demand by January 8, 2016, Plaintiffs would prepare and file a 8 Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant. On January 4, 2016, the Court’s Clerk issued a 9 Notice Continuing the Standby Order of Dismissal Hearing scheduled for January 7, 2016 to 10 March 3, 2016, and ordered Plaintiffs to file a Show Cause Response by February 29, 2016. 11 After Plaintiffs filed their January 4, 2016, Show Cause Response, Defendant contacted 12 Plaintiffs regarding the amounts due and submitted a second request for a waiver of the liquidated 13 damages owed by it to Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs advised Defendant that interest and attorneys’ fees 14 must be paid before its request for a waiver of liquidated damages will be considered by Plaintiffs. 15 Plaintiffs advised Defendant of the amount owed, less liquidated damages, and demanded 16 payment by March 4, 2016. 17 In Plaintiffs’ Response to the Court’s Standby Order for Dismissal filed on February 29, 18 2016, Plaintiffs informed the Court that upon receipt and bank clearance of Defendant’s payment, 19 Plaintiffs would consider Defendant’s request for a waiver of the liquidated damages. Plaintiffs 20 also advised Defendant that if its request for a waiver of liquidated damages was denied, and 21 Defendant could not pay the amount due in full, Defendant must enter into a payment plan. 22 Defendant submitted payment of the amounts owed, less liquidated damages, and 23 Defendant’s request for a waiver of the liquidated damages was presented to Plaintiffs’ Board of 24 Trustees. Plaintiffs’ Board of Trustees denied the waiver of a portion of the liquidated damages 25 owed by Defendant, but granted a waiver of another portion of the liquidated damages, 26 conditioned upon receipt of payment for other amounts remaining due (including the above27 referenced liquidated damages which were not waived, additional interest and attorneys’ fees 28 incurred, and Defendant’s delinquent March 2016 contributions). The waiver is also conditioned -2PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO STANDBY ORDER OF DISMISSAL (ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE) Case No.: C14-3690 RS P:\CLIENTS\BRICL\Cal Tex Masonry\Pleadings\Response to Order to Show Cause 042916.docx 1 upon Defendant’s timely payment of contributions to Plaintiffs for a period of twelve (12) 2 consecutive months, beginning with the month of April 2016. Plaintiffs advised Defendant of the liquidated damages owed, as well as the conditions for 3 4 the waiver of the remaining liquidated damages held in abeyance, and demanded payment of 5 amounts owed by May 2, 2016. Plaintiffs also advised Defendant that if it could not pay the 6 amount due in full, Defendant could enter into a payment plan. As Defendant owes amounts to Plaintiffs and has a conditional waiver of liquidated 7 8 damages pending, Plaintiffs are unable to file a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of this action. 9 However, the parties are in communication regarding the amounts owed to Plaintiffs and hope to 10 reach an informal resolution of this matter. If an informal resolution cannot be reached, Plaintiffs 11 intend on filing a Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant. Therefore, Plaintiffs 12 respectfully request that the Court vacate, or alternatively continue, its Standby Order of Dismissal 13 (Order to Show Cause). Respectfully submitted. 14 15 Dated: May 2, 2016 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 16 By: 17 18 /S/ Michele R. Stafford Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Bricklayers Local No. 3 Pension Trust, et al. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Based on the foregoing and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Standby Order of 21 22 July 7 1:30 pm Dismissal is vacated, or continued to ______________________ at _________. Date: 23 5/2/16 HONORABLE JUDGE RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 -3PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO STANDBY ORDER OF DISMISSAL (ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE) Case No.: C14-3690 RS P:\CLIENTS\BRICL\Cal Tex Masonry\Pleadings\Response to Order to Show Cause 042916.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?