Roe v. LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc., et al

Filing 13

ORDER GRANTING re 11 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint filed by First Advantage LNS Screening Solutions, Inc. Answer or responsive pleading due by 9/24/14. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/25/14. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2014)

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
G. Daniel Newland (SBN 87965)
[e-mail]
560 Mission Street, 31st Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Frederick T. Smith (pro hac vice application to be
submitted)
fsmithgveyfarth.corn
Megan H. Poonolly (pro hac vice application to be
submitted)
mpoonolly@seyfarth. corn
1075 Peachtree Street N.E., Suite 2500
Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3962
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
FIRST ADVANTAGE LNS BACKGROUND
SCREENING SOLUTIONS, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEON ROE, an individual,
Plaintiff,
v.
LEXISNEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS, a corporation
doing business in California; and DOES 1-10,
inclusive,

Case No. 3:14-CV-03737
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Date Action Filed: August 18, 2014
[Civil Local Rule 6-1(a)]

Defendants.

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1(a), IT IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED, AGREED
AND STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Leon Roe ("Plaintiff") and Defendant First Advantage
LNS Screening Solutions, Inc. ("First Advantage"), to the following:

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
17791661v.1

The Parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to extend the time for
First Advantage to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by thirty (30) days, until and
including September 24, 2014. First Advantage requests the additional time to complete their
investigation and prepare their response. There are no status conferences or hearings scheduled that
will be affected by this stipulation. This stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose of
causing unwarranted delay.
DATED: August 22, 2014

Respectfully submitted,

LAW OFFICE OF RUDOLPH J. ALEJO

By:/s Rudolph J. Alejo
Rudolph J. Alejo, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff
Leon Roe

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

RT

A

H

ER

Spero

FO

NO

seph C.

Judge Jo

R NIA

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

LI

UNIT
ED

Dated: 8/25/14

By:/s G. Daniel Newland
G. Daniel Newland
Attorney for Defendant
FIRST ADVANTAGE LNS SCREENING
SOLUTIONS, INC.

RT
U
O

S

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

2
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
17791661v.1

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1
I, G. Daniel Newland. am the ECF User whose ID and Password are being used to file this
document. I hereby attest that Rudolph J. Alejo concurs in this filing.

Dated: August 22, 2014

/s/ G. Daniel Newland
G. Daniel Newland

3
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
17791661v.1