Tassano v. Innovative Medical Products, Inc.

Filing 15

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 13 Stipulation selecting Private Mediation.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2014)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03755 VC

LORI TASSANO
Plaintiff(s),

STIPULATTON AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

v

INNOVATIVE MEDICAL PRODUCTS.
INC, et al. ,
Defendant(s).

I
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

n
tl
tr

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R.4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

Q{ote: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magístrate Judge is

appreciøbly more likely to meet their needs than any other þrm of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and møy notfile this form. They must insteadfile a Notice of Needfor
ADR Phone Conference. See Civíl Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process:
X Private ADR (please identifu process and provider) Priv-ate mediation by Stephen
S. Harper. Esq.

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline ß 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )

tl

X
Dated:

otherrequested deadline

lo

,/
for

Dated:

ta/Lq /Pl
Attorney for Defendant

CONTINUE TO FOLLO'WING PAGE
IPROPOSEDI ORDER

XX
f

T

Dated:

The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

November 4, 2014
UNITED STATES

JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., 'oStipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation."

Rev.

l2lll
Page2

of2

PROOF OF SERVICE

1

2

Case
3

Gourt:

4

Case
5
1

6

Name:
No.:

Lori TASSANO vs. INNOVATIVE MEDICAL PRODUCTS, lNC. et al

United States District Court, Northern District of California
3:14-cv-03755 VC

. At the time of service I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action.

2.

My business address is Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1800, San Francisco, CA
94111.

B

3.

On October 29,20141 served the following documents.

I

STTPULATTON AND IPROPOSEDI ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

7

10

4.

I served the documents on the

persons below as follows

11

12
13

14

Bradley D. Fell, Esq.
LAW OFFICE OF BRADLEY D. FELL
590 Lennon Lane, Suite 120
Walnut Creek, CA 94598
Phone. [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

15

Attorn eys for Pl a intiff
16
17

5.
1B

19

The documents were served by the following means (specify):

X

By electronic filing. I served the documents by electronic transmission
via the internet for uploading onto the District Couft website/docket.

20
21

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the
foregoing is true and correct.

22
23

Date: October 29,

2014

24

Esther Hom

25
26
27
28

-1PROOF OF SERVICE