Marcus et al v. Apple Inc.

Filing 34

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 33 JOINT STIPULATION.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 URIEL MARCUS and BENEDICT VERCELES, on behalf of others similarly situated, 12 13 14 Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART JOINT STIPULATION APPLE INC., 15 Defendant. / 16 17 No. C 14-03824 WHA At 7:07 pm yesterday, plaintiffs’ attorney Omar Rosales filed a joint stipulation (1) to 18 extend plaintiffs’ deadline for opposing defendant’s motion to dismiss, from November 12, 19 2014, to November 24, 2014; (2) to extend defendant’s deadline for a reply from November 19, 20 2014, to December 4, 2014; (3) to continue the hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss, from 21 December 11, 2014, to December 18, 2014; and (4) to continue the initial case management 22 conference, from November 20, 2014, to December 18, 2014. In short, this joint stipulation 23 stems from Attorney Rosales’ declaration that he “had an unexpected doctor’s visit that lasted 24 longer than [he] anticipated” on November 12, 2014, the day that plaintiffs’ opposition was due 25 (Rosales Decl. ¶ 2). In his declaration, Attorney Rosales provides no other detail about this 26 doctor’s visit. 27 28 To the extent stated, the joint stipulation is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion to dismiss is due by no later than 8 AM ON NOVEMBER 17, 2014. Any reply thereto is due by 4 PM ON NOVEMBER 25, 2014. Both the hearing on the 1 motion to dismiss and the initial case management conference will take place at 8 AM ON 2 DECEMBER 11, 2014. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: November 13, 2014. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?