Marcus et al v. Apple Inc.
Filing
34
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 33 JOINT STIPULATION.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
URIEL MARCUS and BENEDICT
VERCELES, on behalf of others
similarly situated,
12
13
14
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
AND DENYING IN PART JOINT
STIPULATION
APPLE INC.,
15
Defendant.
/
16
17
No. C 14-03824 WHA
At 7:07 pm yesterday, plaintiffs’ attorney Omar Rosales filed a joint stipulation (1) to
18
extend plaintiffs’ deadline for opposing defendant’s motion to dismiss, from November 12,
19
2014, to November 24, 2014; (2) to extend defendant’s deadline for a reply from November 19,
20
2014, to December 4, 2014; (3) to continue the hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss, from
21
December 11, 2014, to December 18, 2014; and (4) to continue the initial case management
22
conference, from November 20, 2014, to December 18, 2014. In short, this joint stipulation
23
stems from Attorney Rosales’ declaration that he “had an unexpected doctor’s visit that lasted
24
longer than [he] anticipated” on November 12, 2014, the day that plaintiffs’ opposition was due
25
(Rosales Decl. ¶ 2). In his declaration, Attorney Rosales provides no other detail about this
26
doctor’s visit.
27
28
To the extent stated, the joint stipulation is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
Plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion to dismiss is due by no later than 8 AM ON NOVEMBER 17,
2014. Any reply thereto is due by 4 PM ON NOVEMBER 25, 2014. Both the hearing on the
1
motion to dismiss and the initial case management conference will take place at 8 AM ON
2
DECEMBER 11, 2014.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: November 13, 2014.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?