Judge v. Army Corp of Engineering

Filing 12

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 11 Amended Complaint. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 10/31/2014 09:30 AM. Show Cause Response due by 10/24/2014.. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on October 7, 2014. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2014) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/7/2014: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (klhS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ROBERT E. JUDGE, Case No. 14-cv-03863-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER REGARDING AMENDED COMPLAINT 9 10 ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERING, Re: Dkt. No. 11 Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 The Court has previously issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be 13 dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Dkt. 10. A hearing is 14 scheduled for October 31, 2014. 15 On October 3, 2014, Plaintiff Robert E. Judge filed a document titled “Complaint on 16 treatment denial,” which appears to be a copy of Plaintiff’s original Complaint with minor 17 additions. Dkt. 11. The Court construes this document as an Amended Complaint. In full, it 18 reads as follows, with underlines added by the Court to indicate additions from the previous 19 Complaint: 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 California cannot stop pollution coming from both rivers - New River - Alamo river. For the preservation of California to stop pollution must stop both rivers natural resource areas. In which this thesis. Recognizing constitutional assessment in which allows both rivers from Entering into US. Both rivers are declare as the polluted waters of the world. The alternative of this problem is to stop both rivers coming into the US through Mexico... Stopping Rivers from going in U.S.. Local governments based on enrollment valuations are in need of this trial case to be approved with blockade of rivers: Conversion to population growth, the water get polluted more/more from Mexico. This alarming rate continues dramatically from Mexico: increases of population. United States must Stop this river property in actual use. 1 2 3 The Petitioner had wrote a novel about this project. In which he began 2000. Conclusion after having used many strategic response to the pollution in both rivers. This began 1900, and the Salton Sea in which had been these two rivers assessment leveling off local government. 4 Am. Compl. (Dkt. 11) (sic throughout, emphasis added). The document also includes copies of 5 the Summons and Proof of Service. 6 This Amended Complaint does not address the deficiencies identified in the Court’s 7 previous Order. Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED to appear on October 31, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. 8 in Courtroom G, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 15th Floor, San Francisco, CA, and show cause 9 why the Amended Complaint should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Defendant is not required to appear but may do so if it wishes. Any memorandum in 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 support or opposition shall be filed by October 24, 2014 and shall not exceed five pages. The case 12 is otherwise STAYED and all other deadlines shall be tolled from the date of this Order through 13 October 31, 2014. 14 Plaintiff may wish to seek free limited legal assistance from the Legal Help Center by 15 calling the appointment line at (415) 782-8982 or signing up for an appointment in the 16 appointment book located outside the door of the Help Center, located at the San Francisco 17 courthouse at 450 Golden Gate Avenue on the 15th Floor, Room 2796. Appointments are held 18 Monday through Friday at various times throughout the day. Plaintiff can speak with an attorney 19 who will provide basic legal help, but not legal representation. 20 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 7, 2014 ______________________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO United States Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?