Judge v. Army Corp of Engineering
Filing
12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 11 Amended Complaint. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 10/31/2014 09:30 AM. Show Cause Response due by 10/24/2014.. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on October 7, 2014. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2014) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/7/2014: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (klhS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ROBERT E. JUDGE,
Case No. 14-cv-03863-JCS
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER REGARDING AMENDED
COMPLAINT
9
10
ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERING,
Re: Dkt. No. 11
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
The Court has previously issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be
13
dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Dkt. 10. A hearing is
14
scheduled for October 31, 2014.
15
On October 3, 2014, Plaintiff Robert E. Judge filed a document titled “Complaint on
16
treatment denial,” which appears to be a copy of Plaintiff’s original Complaint with minor
17
additions. Dkt. 11. The Court construes this document as an Amended Complaint. In full, it
18
reads as follows, with underlines added by the Court to indicate additions from the previous
19
Complaint:
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
California cannot stop pollution coming from both rivers - New
River - Alamo river. For the preservation of California to stop
pollution must stop both rivers natural resource areas. In which this
thesis.
Recognizing constitutional assessment in which allows both rivers
from Entering into US. Both rivers are declare as the polluted
waters of the world. The alternative of this problem is to stop both
rivers coming into the US through Mexico... Stopping Rivers from
going in U.S..
Local governments based on enrollment valuations are in need of
this trial case to be approved with blockade of rivers: Conversion to
population growth, the water get polluted more/more from Mexico.
This alarming rate continues dramatically from Mexico: increases of
population. United States must Stop this river property in actual
use.
1
2
3
The Petitioner had wrote a novel about this project. In which he
began 2000. Conclusion after having used many strategic response
to the pollution in both rivers. This began 1900, and the Salton Sea
in which had been these two rivers assessment leveling off local
government.
4
Am. Compl. (Dkt. 11) (sic throughout, emphasis added). The document also includes copies of
5
the Summons and Proof of Service.
6
This Amended Complaint does not address the deficiencies identified in the Court’s
7
previous Order. Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED to appear on October 31, 2014 at 9:30 a.m.
8
in Courtroom G, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 15th Floor, San Francisco, CA, and show cause
9
why the Amended Complaint should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a
claim. Defendant is not required to appear but may do so if it wishes. Any memorandum in
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
support or opposition shall be filed by October 24, 2014 and shall not exceed five pages. The case
12
is otherwise STAYED and all other deadlines shall be tolled from the date of this Order through
13
October 31, 2014.
14
Plaintiff may wish to seek free limited legal assistance from the Legal Help Center by
15
calling the appointment line at (415) 782-8982 or signing up for an appointment in the
16
appointment book located outside the door of the Help Center, located at the San Francisco
17
courthouse at 450 Golden Gate Avenue on the 15th Floor, Room 2796. Appointments are held
18
Monday through Friday at various times throughout the day. Plaintiff can speak with an attorney
19
who will provide basic legal help, but not legal representation.
20
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 7, 2014
______________________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
United States Magistrate Judge
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?