J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Bermudez
Filing
34
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria denying 32 Motion to Alter Judgment.(knmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.,
Case No. 14-cv-03925-VC
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
ALTER JUDGMENT
9
10
IGNACIO BERMUDEZ,
Re: Doc. No. 32
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
The motion to alter or amend the judgment is denied. The motion is based on the fact that
14
J & J's investigator attached a picture to her affidavit (or someone attached a picture to her
15
affidavit). The picture is of two satellite dishes on the roof of a building. J & J argues that this
16
picture constitutes proof that the defendant is liable under 42 U.S.C. ยง 605. However, the
17
investigator does not mention the photograph in her affidavit, much less authenticate it or describe
18
what it depicts. Under these circumstances, the Court cannot conclude that the picture justifies a
19
finding of liability under Section 605. The award of discretionary damages under Section 553 was
20
therefore appropriate, and there is no basis for altering the judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e);
21
Kona Enterprises, Inc. v. Estate of Bishop, 229 F.3d 877, 890 (9th Cir. 2000) (Rule 59(e) is an
22
"extraordinary remedy, to be used sparingly in the interests of finality and conservation of judicial
23
resources" (citation omitted)).
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 14, 2015
______________________________________
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?