J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Gonzalez et al

Filing 34

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria denying 32 Motion to Alter Judgment.(knmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.,

Case No. 14-cv-03932-VC

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
ALTER JUDGMENT

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

GERARDO GUERRERO GONZALEZ, et
al.,

Re: Doc. No. 32

Defendants.

12
13

The motion to alter or amend the judgment is denied because J & J Sports has not offered
any newly discovered evidence, demonstrated that the Court committed clear error, or argued that

14
there has been an intervening change in the controlling law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e); Kona
15
Enterprises, Inc. v. Estate of Bishop, 229 F.3d 877, 890 (9th Cir. 2000) (Rule 59(e) is an
16
"extraordinary remedy, to be used sparingly in the interests of finality and conservation of judicial
17
18

resources" (citation omitted)). The discretionary statutory damages awarded were appropriate
given the facts of the case. See Order, Docket No. 31.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 14, 2015
______________________________________
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge