Twin Peaks Software Inc. v. IBM Corporation

Filing 54

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 53 JOINT STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Requesting Leave To File First Amended Joint Claim Construction Statement filed by IBM Corporation. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 14, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2015)

Download PDF
1 BRUCE J. WECKER (CA Bar. No. 078530) 2 3 4 5 bwecker@hausfeldllp.com CHRISTOPHER L. LEBSOCK (CA Bar. No.184546) clebsock@hausfeldllp.com HAUSFELD LLP 600 Montgomery Street, Suite 3200 San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: (415) 633-1908 Fax: (415) 358-4980 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Twin Peaks Software 7 Inc. Robert W. Stone (CA Bar No. 163513) robertstone@quinnemanuel.com Andrew J. Bramhall (CA Bar No. 253115) andrewbramhall@quinnemanuel.com Brice C. Lynch (CA Bar No. 288567) bricelynch@quinnemanuel.com QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 T: 650.801.5000 F: 650.801.5100 Attorneys for Defendant IBM Corporation 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 TWIN PEAKS SOFTWARE INC., CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03933-JST 13 Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 IBM CORPORATION, JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT 16 Defendant. 17 Hon. Jon S. Tigar 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03933-JST JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT JOINT STIPULATION 1 2 Plaintiff Twin Peaks Software Inc. (“Twin Peaks”) and Defendant International Business 3 Machines Corporation (“IBM”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby make a 4 stipulated request to amend the Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement (Patent L.R. 5 4-3) (“Joint Statement”) (Dkt. No. 39) and hereby provide notice to the Court that certain claim 6 construction disputes have been resolved; 7 WHEREAS, the Parties file this stipulation and notice in light of a mutual agreement 8 having been reached between the Parties resolving certain issues raised during claim construction 9 briefing and discovery; 10 WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties, having met and conferred, agreed to amend the Joint 11 Statement to reflect (1) IBM’s indefiniteness arguments and alternative constructions for certain 12 terms in claims 1 and 4 of U.S. Patent No. 7,418,439 (‘the ‘439 Patent), and (2) Twin Peaks’ 13 withdrawal of its assertion of claim 2 of the ‘439 patent against IBM; 14 WHEREAS, the Parties have not previously amended or otherwise modified the Joint 15 Statement filed on July 15, 2015; 16 WHEREAS, at the Technical Tutorial on November 17, 2015, the Parties informed the 17 Court that they would be filing an Amended Joint Claim Construction Statement and Pre-Hearing 18 Statement that would identify the terms to be construed and provide an order in which those terms 19 would be argued at the Markman hearing; 20 WHEREAS, the Parties make a stipulated request for the Court to grant leave to file the 21 Proposed First Amended Joint Claim Construction Statement and Pre-Hearing Statement (Patent 22 L.R. 4-3), attached hereto as Exhibit A. 23 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1, by 24 Twin Peaks and IBM, through their respective counsel, that the Parties shall file the First 25 Amended Joint Claim Construction Statement and Pre-Hearing Statement (Patent L.R. 4-3), 26 attached hereto as Exhibit A. 27 28 -1- CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03933-JST JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 2 DATED: December 11, 2015 3 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 4 By /s/ Andrew J. Bramhall Andrew J. Bramhall Attorney for Defendant International Business Machines Corporation 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 DATED: December 11, 2015 HAUSFELD LLP By /s/ Bruce J. Wecker Bruce J. Wecker Attorneys for Plaintiff Twin Peaks Software Inc.. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03933-JST JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 12 ER R NIA Ti ga r FO n S. J u d ge J o H 11 RT 10 NO 9 I By Honorable Jon S. Tigar UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE LI 8 ERED ORD T IS SO A 7 December 14, DATED: __________________ 2015 UNIT ED 6 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 5 S 4 N D IS T IC T R OF C 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:14-cv-03933-JST [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 FILER’S ATTESTATION Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i) regarding signatures, I, Andrew J. Bramhall, attest that 3 concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I 4 declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing 5 is true and correct. 6 7 8 DATED: December 11, 2015 9 10 By /s/ Andrew J. Bramhall Andrew J. Bramhall Attorney for Defendant International Business Machines Corporation 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- Case No. 3:14-cv-03933-JST FILER’S ATTESTATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?