Twin Peaks Software Inc. v. IBM Corporation
Filing
54
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 53 JOINT STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Requesting Leave To File First Amended Joint Claim Construction Statement filed by IBM Corporation. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 14, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2015)
1 BRUCE J. WECKER (CA Bar. No. 078530)
2
3
4
5
bwecker@hausfeldllp.com
CHRISTOPHER L. LEBSOCK (CA Bar.
No.184546)
clebsock@hausfeldllp.com
HAUSFELD LLP
600 Montgomery Street, Suite 3200
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: (415) 633-1908
Fax: (415) 358-4980
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff Twin Peaks Software
7 Inc.
Robert W. Stone (CA Bar No. 163513)
robertstone@quinnemanuel.com
Andrew J. Bramhall (CA Bar No. 253115)
andrewbramhall@quinnemanuel.com
Brice C. Lynch (CA Bar No. 288567)
bricelynch@quinnemanuel.com
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
T: 650.801.5000
F: 650.801.5100
Attorneys for Defendant IBM Corporation
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
TWIN PEAKS SOFTWARE INC.,
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03933-JST
13
Plaintiff,
14
vs.
15
IBM CORPORATION,
JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING
LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED
JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
STATEMENT
16
Defendant.
17
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03933-JST
JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE
FIRST AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
JOINT STIPULATION
1
2
Plaintiff Twin Peaks Software Inc. (“Twin Peaks”) and Defendant International Business
3 Machines Corporation (“IBM”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby make a
4 stipulated request to amend the Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement (Patent L.R.
5 4-3) (“Joint Statement”) (Dkt. No. 39) and hereby provide notice to the Court that certain claim
6 construction disputes have been resolved;
7
WHEREAS, the Parties file this stipulation and notice in light of a mutual agreement
8 having been reached between the Parties resolving certain issues raised during claim construction
9 briefing and discovery;
10
WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties, having met and conferred, agreed to amend the Joint
11 Statement to reflect (1) IBM’s indefiniteness arguments and alternative constructions for certain
12 terms in claims 1 and 4 of U.S. Patent No. 7,418,439 (‘the ‘439 Patent), and (2) Twin Peaks’
13 withdrawal of its assertion of claim 2 of the ‘439 patent against IBM;
14
WHEREAS, the Parties have not previously amended or otherwise modified the Joint
15 Statement filed on July 15, 2015;
16
WHEREAS, at the Technical Tutorial on November 17, 2015, the Parties informed the
17 Court that they would be filing an Amended Joint Claim Construction Statement and Pre-Hearing
18 Statement that would identify the terms to be construed and provide an order in which those terms
19 would be argued at the Markman hearing;
20
WHEREAS, the Parties make a stipulated request for the Court to grant leave to file the
21 Proposed First Amended Joint Claim Construction Statement and Pre-Hearing Statement (Patent
22 L.R. 4-3), attached hereto as Exhibit A.
23
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1, by
24 Twin Peaks and IBM, through their respective counsel, that the Parties shall file the First
25 Amended Joint Claim Construction Statement and Pre-Hearing Statement (Patent L.R. 4-3),
26 attached hereto as Exhibit A.
27
28
-1-
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03933-JST
JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE
FIRST AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
1 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
2
DATED: December 11, 2015
3
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
4
By /s/ Andrew J. Bramhall
Andrew J. Bramhall
Attorney for Defendant International Business
Machines Corporation
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
DATED: December 11, 2015
HAUSFELD LLP
By /s/ Bruce J. Wecker
Bruce J. Wecker
Attorneys for Plaintiff Twin Peaks Software Inc..
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03933-JST
JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE
FIRST AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
1
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
12
ER
R NIA
Ti ga r
FO
n S.
J u d ge J o
H
11
RT
10
NO
9
I
By
Honorable Jon S. Tigar
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
LI
8
ERED
ORD
T IS SO
A
7
December 14,
DATED: __________________ 2015
UNIT
ED
6
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
5
S
4
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:14-cv-03933-JST
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
FILER’S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i) regarding signatures, I, Andrew J. Bramhall, attest that
3 concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I
4 declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing
5 is true and correct.
6
7
8 DATED: December 11, 2015
9
10
By /s/ Andrew J. Bramhall
Andrew J. Bramhall
Attorney for Defendant International Business
Machines Corporation
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
Case No. 3:14-cv-03933-JST
FILER’S ATTESTATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?