Allen, et al v. County of Lake, et al

Filing 60

ORDER re 58 Stipulation with Proposed Order. Briefing and hearing on 46 Motion to Dismiss and 56 Motion to Dismiss STAYED. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 10/14/2014. (tehlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2014)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

MONA ALLEN, et al.,

8

Plaintiffs,

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

v.
COUNTY OF LAKE, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-03934-TEH
ORDER STAYING DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS TO DISMISS, DENYING
STIPULATION, AND VACATING
HEARING.

12
13

The Court has considered the stipulation for an extension of time as to Plaintiffs’

14

Opposition to the Lake County Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Stipulation and Proposed

15

Order (Docket No. 58). The Court recognizes that Plaintiffs intend to file a Motion for

16

Leave to Amend their Complaint on October 20, 2014. Decl. of Joseph Elford at 2

17

(Docket No. 58-1). An amended Complaint may render moot some or all of Defendants’

18

arguments in their Motions to Dismiss. Accordingly, in the interest of judicial economy,

19

the Court STAYS the pending Motions to Dismiss until resolution of Plaintiffs’

20

forthcoming Motion for Leave to Amend, DENIES the stipulation for an extension of time

21

as moot, and VACATES the hearing currently scheduled for November 24, 2014.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27
28

Dated: 10/14/2014

_____________________________________
THELTON E. HENDERSON
United States District Judge