Allen, et al v. County of Lake, et al

Filing 60

ORDER re 58 Stipulation with Proposed Order. Briefing and hearing on 46 Motion to Dismiss and 56 Motion to Dismiss STAYED. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 10/14/2014. (tehlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MONA ALLEN, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 v. COUNTY OF LAKE, et al., Defendants. Case No. 14-cv-03934-TEH ORDER STAYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS, DENYING STIPULATION, AND VACATING HEARING. 12 13 The Court has considered the stipulation for an extension of time as to Plaintiffs’ 14 Opposition to the Lake County Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Stipulation and Proposed 15 Order (Docket No. 58). The Court recognizes that Plaintiffs intend to file a Motion for 16 Leave to Amend their Complaint on October 20, 2014. Decl. of Joseph Elford at 2 17 (Docket No. 58-1). An amended Complaint may render moot some or all of Defendants’ 18 arguments in their Motions to Dismiss. Accordingly, in the interest of judicial economy, 19 the Court STAYS the pending Motions to Dismiss until resolution of Plaintiffs’ 20 forthcoming Motion for Leave to Amend, DENIES the stipulation for an extension of time 21 as moot, and VACATES the hearing currently scheduled for November 24, 2014. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 10/14/2014 _____________________________________ THELTON E. HENDERSON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?