Boswell v. Boresha International, Inc., et. al.
Filing
40
ORDER DISMISSING CASE PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/10/2014. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
Steven N.H. Wood, Esq. (SBN 161291)
BERGQUIST, WOOD, MCINTOSH & SETO, LLP
1470 Maria Lane, Suite 300
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone:
(925) 938-6100
Facsimile:
(925) 938-4354
Attorneys for Defendant
BORESHA INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
a California corporation
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
11
Case No. 3:14-cv-04025-MEJ
JOSEPH W. BOSWELL,
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
BORESHA INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
a California corporation, and
CORNERSTONE MARKETING, LLC,
an Indiana limited liability company,
15
16
17
Defendants.
18
19
Now come the parties to this action, Joseph W. Boswell, Plaintiff, by Counsel, Barry L.
20
Bruce and Associates, L.C.; Boresha International, Inc., Defendant, by Counsel Steven N.H.
21
Wood, Bergquist, Wood, McIntosh & Seto, LLP; Cornerstone Marketing, LLC, Defendant, by
22
Joseph Juliano, Managing Member, pro se, and respectfully request this Court dismiss the subject
23
action, without prejudice, and represent until the Court as follows:
24
By Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on September 4, 2014, in the United States
25
District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, Beckley Division, Case No 5:11-cv-
26
15498, the Court found that this matter shall be transferred to the United States District Court for
27
the Northern District of California because “…the parties agreed to jurisdiction and venue in
28
California per the plainly worded MOU that incorporated Boresha’s Policies and Procedures.”
AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
1
1
Boresha’s Policies and Procedures, at paragraph 44, Dispute Resolution, provides that “…any
2
controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, shall be
3
settled through confidential arbitration. The Parties waive rights to trial by jury or to any Court.”
4
The Court, having considered the representations of the parties and the Memorandum
5
Opinion and Order entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of West
6
Virginia, hereby
10
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
R NIA
10
ENTERED this the ___ day of November, 2014.
RT
U
O
RT
FO
NO
____________________________________
na James
aria-Ele
Judge M
Judge
11
12
A
H
ER
LI
9
docket of the Court.
S
8
ORDERS that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, and stricken from the active
UNIT
ED
7
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
13
Prepared By:
Reviewed and Agreed By:
14
BERGQUIST, WOOD, MCINTOSH & SETO, LLP
BARRY L. BRUCE AND ASSOCIATES, L.C.
15
By: /s/ Steven N.H. Wood, Esq.
___________________________________
Steven N.H. Wood, CA State Bar #161291
By: /s/ Barry L. Bruce, Esq.
_________________________________
Barry L. Bruce, WV State Bar ID #511
BARRY L. BRUCE AND ASSOCIATES, L.C.
P.O. Box 388
Lewisburg, WV 24901
Tel: (304) 645-4182
Fax: (304) 645-4183
Email: bbruce@blblaw.org
(Counsel for Plaintiff, Joseph Boswell, III)
16
17
18
19
20
21
BERGQUIST, WOOD, MCINTOSH & SETO, LLP
1470 Maria Lane, Suite 300
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Tel: (925) 938-6100
Fax: (925) 938-4354
Email: wood@wcjuris.com
(Counsel for Defendant Boresha
International, Inc.)
22
CORNERSTONE MARKETING, LLC
23
24
25
26
27
28
By: /s/ Joseph Juliano
__________________________________
Joseph Juliano, Managing Member
CORNERSTONE MARKETING, LLC
11437 N. Sarah Lane
Mooresville, IN 46158
Tel: (317) 697-6148
(Defendant Cornerstone Marketing, LLC, pro se)
AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
2
1
2
3
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
I, Steven N.H. Wood, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used
to file the foregoing:
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
I hereby attest that Barry L. Bruce, Attorney for Plaintiff Joseph Boswell, III, and Joseph
Juliano, Managing Member of Cornerstone Marketing, LLC, pro se, signatories to this Agreed
Order of Dismissal, concurred in this filing.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
true and correct. Executed this 7th day of November, 2014, in Walnut Creek, California.
BERGQUIST, WOOD, MCINTOSH & SETO, LLP
By: /s/ Steven N.H. Wood, Esq.
___________________________________
Steven N.H. Wood, CA State Bar #161291
BERGQUIST, WOOD, MCINTOSH & SETO, LLP
1470 Maria Lane, Suite 300
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Tel: (925) 938-6100
Fax: (925) 938-4354
Email: wood@wcjuris.com
(Counsel for Defendant Boresha
International, Inc.)
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
3
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I, Kimberly C. Britz, secretary to Steven N.H. Wood, Esq., certify on this 10th day of
3
November, 2014 that a true and correct copy of the “AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL” was
4
filed with the Clerk, of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, using the CM/ECF
5
filing system, which caused a copy to be electronically mailed to all CM/ECF participants
6
registered to receive electronic notices in the above-captioned case.
7
8
9
10
11
Steven N.H. Wood, Esq.
BERGQUIST, WOOD, MCINTOSH & SETO, LLP
1470 Maria Lane, Suite 300
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
wood@wcjuris.com
Counsel for Defendant
BORESHA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
12
13
And deposited the same to the following in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, sealed in an envelope,
14
and addressed as follows:
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Barry L. Bruce, Esq.
BARRY L. BRUCE & ASSOCIATES, L.C.
101 West Randolph Street
P.O. Box 388
Lewisburg, WV 24901
bbruce@blblaw.org
Counsel for Plaintiff
Joseph Juliano
11437 N. Sarah Lane
Mooresville, IN 46058
Registered Agent for Cornerstone Marketing, LLC
BERGQUIST, WOOD, MCINTOSH & SETO, LLP
24
25
26
27
28
By: /s/ Kimberly C. Britz
___________________________________
Secretary to Steven N.H. Wood, Esq.
BERGQUIST, WOOD, MCINTOSH & SETO, LLP
1470 Maria Lane, Suite 300
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Tel: (925) 938-6100
Fax: (925) 938-4354
AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?