Finley v. Dynamic Recovery Solutions LLC et al

Filing 70

ORDER by Judge Thelton E. Henderson granting in part 69 Motion to Continue. Mediation cut-off date is continued to November 9, 2015. (tehlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NANCY H. FINLEY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 18 vs. DYNAMIC RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, ACCELERATED FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, CONSUMER RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC and Does 1 through 10, 19 Defendants. 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 14-cv-04028-TEH Hon. Thelton E. Henderson [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO CONTINUE MEDIATION CUT-OFF DATE AND STATUS CONFERENCE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Administrative Relief to Continue Mediation Cut-Off Date and Status Conference 1 1 Having considered the Defendants’ Motion for Administrative Relief to 2 3 4 Continue Mediation Cut-Off Date and Status Conference, and for good cause shown, 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the mediation cut-off date is extended up to 6 7 8 and including November 9, 2015. The status conference presently scheduled with Magistrate Judge Vadas on August 25, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. is continued to 9 10 11 ____________, 2015 at _________. The parties shall seek a continuance of the August 25, 2015 status 12 Judge Vadas. helto ER LI Judge T H 20 RT 19 Hon. Thelton E. Henderson United States District eJudgen nderso n E. H NO 18 DATED: 07/20/15 21 A 17 ERED O ORD D IT IS S ____________________________ DIFIE AS MO R NIA 16 FO 15 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 14 conference by administrative motion or stipulation submitted to Magistrate UNIT ED 13 N F D IS T IC T O R C 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Administrative Relief to Continue Mediation Cut-Off Date and Status Conference 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?