Ronpak, Inc. v. Electronics For Imaging, Inc.

Filing 37

SCHEDULING ORDER. Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/8/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Trial set for 5/2/2016 - 5/17/2016 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 18, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2015)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

RONPAK, INC.,

Case No. 14-cv-04058-JST

Plaintiff,
9
v.

SCHEDULING ORDER

10
11

ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING, INC.,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendant.
12
13
14

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

15
Event

Deadline

16
Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings

March 2, 2015

Fact discovery cut-off

July 15, 2015

19

Expert disclosures

August 14, 2015

20

Expert rebuttal

August 28, 2015

21

Expert discovery cut-off

September 18, 2015

Deadline to file dispositive motions

December 10, 2015

Pretrial conference statement due

March 29, 2016

Pretrial conference

April 8, 2016 at 2:00
p.m.

Trial

May 2, 2016 at 8:30
a.m.

Estimate of trial length (in days)

10 days

17
18

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
2
3

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with
the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.
The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire

4

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely

5

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their

6

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.

7

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are
disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party-

9

controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant

10

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

8

to grant a continuance.

12
13
14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 18, 2015
_______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2