Estate of Yanira Serrano et al v. Trieu et al
Filing
44
STIPULATION TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION. The parties stipulate to dismiss with prejudice the following claims: (1) The Second Claim for Relief for "Municipal Liability for Uncons titutional Customs and Practices 42 U.S.C. § 1983" against Defendant County of San Mateo, alleged in Paragraphs 37-42 of the First Amended Complaint; (2) All claims alleged in the First Amended Complaint against Defendant Julian Venci; (3) All claims alleged in the First Amended Complaint against Defendant Judy Husary; (4) All claims alleged in the First Amended Complaint against the County of San Mateo insofar as they are premised on allegations concerning the acts, omissions, supervision, training, and/or retention of Defendant County of San Mateo's 911 dispatchers, including Defendants Venci and Husary. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 26, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
ARNOLDO CASILLAS, ESQ. (SBN 158519)
DENISSE O. GASTÉLUM, ESQ. (SBN 282771)
CASILLAS, MORENO & ASSOCIATES
3500 W. Beverly Blvd.
Montebello, CA 90640
Telephone: (323) 725-0917
Facsimile: (323) 725-0350
Email: acasillas@morenolawoffices.com
dgastelum@morenolawoffices.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
ESTATE OF YANIRA SERRANO, by and through successors in interest, CARMEN GARCIA and
IGNACIO SERRANO, and CARMEN GARCIA, IGNACIO SERRANO, LORENZO SERRANO,
individually
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
JOHN C. BEIERS, COUNTY COUNSEL (SBN 144282)
By: David A. Levy, Deputy (SBN 77181)
By: Adam W. Ely, Deputy (SBN 226199)
By: Kristina M. Paszek, Deputy (SBN 226351)
Hall of Justice and Records
400 County Center, 6th Floor
Redwood City, CA 94063
Telephone: (650) 363-4756
Facsimile: (650) 363-4034
E-mail: dlevy@smcgov.org
Attorneys for Defendants MENH TRIEU, JULIAN
VENCI, JUDY HUSARY, and COUNTY OF SAN
MATEO
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ESTATE OF YANIRA SERRANO by and through
Successors in interest, CARMEN GARCIA and
IGNACIO SERRANO, and CARMEN GARCIA,
IGNACIO SERRANO, LORENZO SERRANO,
individually,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. CV 14-04081-MMC
STIPULATION TO DISMISS CERTAIN
CLAIMS PURSUANT TO FRCP
42(a)(1)(A)(ii) 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); ORDER
APPROVING STIPULATION
THE HONORABLE MAXINE M.
CHESNEY
vs.
MENH TRIEU, JULIAN VENCI, JUDY HUSARY,
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, DOES 1 THROUGH
10, INCLUSIVE,
Defendants.
Case No. CV 14-04081-MMC
STIPULATION TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS PURSUANT TO FRCP 42(a)(1)(A)(ii)
1
2
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties hereby stipulate to dismiss
with prejudice the following claims:
3
1. The Second Claim for Relief for “Municipal Liability for Unconstitutional Customs and Practices
4
42 U.S.C. § 1983” against Defendant County of San Mateo, alleged in Paragraphs 37-42 of the
5
First Amended Complaint [Dkt. 25];
6
2. All claims alleged in the First Amended Complaint [Dkt. 25] against Defendant Julian Venci;
7
3. All claims alleged in the First Amended Complaint [Dkt. 25] against Defendant Judy Husary;
8
4. All claims alleged in the First Amended Complaint [Dkt. 25] against the County of San Mateo
9
insofar as they are premised on allegations concerning the acts, omissions, supervision, training,
10
and/or retention of Defendant County of San Mateo’s 911 dispatchers, including Defendants
11
Venci and Husary.
12
13
Dated: January 26, 2016
CASILLAS & ASSOCIATES
14
15
By: _____/s/___________________
Arnoldo Casillas
Denisse O. Gastélum
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
16
17
18
19
Dated: January 26, 2016
20
JOHN C. BEIERS, COUNTY COUNSEL
By:
/s/______________
David A. Levy, Deputy
Adam W. Ely, Deputy
Kristina M. Paszek, Deputy
Attorneys for Defendants
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: _____________
Jan. 26, 2016
________________________________________
Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
28
Case No. CV 14-04081-MMC
-2STIPULATION TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS PURSUANT TO FRCP 42(a)(1)(A)(ii)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?