SA Luxury Expeditions LLC v. Latin America for Less, LLC et al

Filing 51

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Motions terminated: 9 MOTION to Dismiss. Show Cause Response due by 1/15/2015 at noon.. Signed by Judge Alsup on January 7, 2015. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 SA LUXURY EXPEDITIONS LLC, a California limited liability company, 8 Plaintiff, 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 No. C 14-04085 WHA v. LATIN AMERICA FOR LESS, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, BERNARD SCHLEIEN, an individual, a/k/a Jose Castrellon, and DOES 1–10, inclusive, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Defendants. / 14 15 16 17 18 19 The operative complaint named two defendants: Latin America for Less, LLC and individual Bernard Schleien. Mr. Schleien allegedly resided in Peru (Compl. ¶ 11). Defendant Latin America for Less then filed a motion to dismiss, which was held in abeyance so that the parties could take discovery on whether there was personal jurisdiction. On January 7, plaintiff filed a notice stating it voluntarily dismissed without prejudice all 20 claims against defendant Latin America for Less under Rule 41 (Dkt. No. 50). Accordingly, 21 docket number 9 is hereby TERMINATED. The January 29 motion hearing is hereby VACATED. 22 For now, the initial case management conference scheduled for January 29 remains on 23 calendar. By JANUARY 15 AT NOON, plaintiff shall please (1) show cause why this action should 24 not be dismissed and (2) brief the service requirements for an individual residing in Peru. Please 25 also append a declaration stating in detail any service efforts with regards to Mr. Schleien and all 26 pertinent proofs of service and/or letters rogatory. 27 28 Dated: January 7, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?