National Federation of the Blind of California et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Filing
51
SCHEDULING ORDER. The 8/5/2015 Case Management Conference is continued to 8/19/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom D, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Updated CMC Statements due 8/12/2105. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 7/30/2015. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No.14-cv-04086-NC
Plaintiffs,
11
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE
BLIND OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
SCHEDULING ORDER
12
v.
Re: Dkt. No. 50
13
14
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
The Court has reviewed the Joint Case Management Statement. In the interest of
17
securing the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this action under Federal Rule
18
of Civil Procedure 1, the Court rules as follows:
19
20
1) Fact discovery is open and the parties should not delay in propounding
21
discovery.
22
23
2) The case schedules proposed by both parties are excessively long. The Court
24
suggests trial be set January 11, 2016, or April 18, 2016. The parties must
25
confer with each other and pick one of those dates, or explain why the case
26
cannot be ready by April 2016.
27
28
//
Case No.:14-cv-04086-NC
1
3) To allow a short period for the parties to confer on trial dates, while initiating
2
discovery and participating in mediation, the CMC is continued to August 19,
3
2015, 10:00 a.m. in San Francisco Courtroom D. Updated CMC statements due
4
August 12. If any party wishes to participate by telephone, please state so in the
5
CMC statement.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: July 30, 2015
9
_____________________________________
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.:14-cv-04086-NC
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?