National Federation of the Blind of California et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Filing 51

SCHEDULING ORDER. The 8/5/2015 Case Management Conference is continued to 8/19/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom D, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Updated CMC Statements due 8/12/2105. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 7/30/2015. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No.14-cv-04086-NC Plaintiffs, 11 NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND OF CALIFORNIA, et al., SCHEDULING ORDER 12 v. Re: Dkt. No. 50 13 14 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants. 15 16 The Court has reviewed the Joint Case Management Statement. In the interest of 17 securing the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this action under Federal Rule 18 of Civil Procedure 1, the Court rules as follows: 19 20 1) Fact discovery is open and the parties should not delay in propounding 21 discovery. 22 23 2) The case schedules proposed by both parties are excessively long. The Court 24 suggests trial be set January 11, 2016, or April 18, 2016. The parties must 25 confer with each other and pick one of those dates, or explain why the case 26 cannot be ready by April 2016. 27 28 // Case No.:14-cv-04086-NC 1 3) To allow a short period for the parties to confer on trial dates, while initiating 2 discovery and participating in mediation, the CMC is continued to August 19, 3 2015, 10:00 a.m. in San Francisco Courtroom D. Updated CMC statements due 4 August 12. If any party wishes to participate by telephone, please state so in the 5 CMC statement. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: July 30, 2015 9 _____________________________________ NATHANAEL M. COUSINS United States Magistrate Judge 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No.:14-cv-04086-NC 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?