Pinkston v. Social Security Administration

Filing 7

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 12/11/2014 at noon.. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 1, 2014. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2014)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8

VERA LEE LYNCH PINKSTON,

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Plaintiff,

No. C 14-04093 WHA

v.
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

12

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Defendant.
/

13
14

On September 9, pro se plaintiff Vera Lee Lynch Pinkston filed a “complaint for judicial

15

review of decision of commissioner of social security.” She, however, alleged “identity theft” and

16

“stolen / loss SSN,” stating that “someone in the Glendale office gave my social security number

17

to a woman white/black and took it too [sic] New York and bought a house and stole my business -

18

SSI. Also, my business and its income” (Dkt. No. 1). She then filed an incomplete application to

19

proceed in forma pauperis. She was given additional time to complete her application. When

20

nothing more was filed, her application was denied without prejudice to a fresh application with

21

complete answers. The Clerk’s office then issued a notice requesting payment of the docketing

22

fee.

23

No fees have been paid; it is unclear whether defendant has been properly served; and there

24

are no pending motions even though two months have came and gone. Accordingly, plaintiff has

25

until DECEMBER 11, 2014 AT NOON to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. If no

26

response is timely filed, this action may be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 1, 2014.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE