Gifford Ludwigsen v. NPL Construction Co.

Filing 8

ORDER GRANTING re 7 Stipulation to Extend Time For Defendant NPL to Respond to Complaint filed by Gifford Ludwigsen. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 10/1/14. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2014)

Download PDF
1 PAUL V. SIMPSON, BAR NO. 83878 2 H. ANN LIROFF, BAR NO. 113180 SARAH E. LUCAS, BAR NO. 148713 3 SIMPSON, GARRITY, INNES & JACUZZI Professional Corporation 4 601 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 950 South San Francisco, California 94080 5 Telephone: (650) 615-4860 Fax: (650) 615-4861 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 Gifford Ludwigsen 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 GIFFORD LUDWIGSEN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 NPL CONSTRUCTION CO., a Nevada 15 Corporation, Defendant. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 14-cv-04104 JCS STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT NPL CONSTRUCTION CO. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {CLIENT FILES/11338/11/00304441.DOCX} STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT NPL CONSTRUCTION CO. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT -1- 1 Defendant NPL Construction Co. (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff Gifford Ludwigsen 2 (“Plaintiff”), by and through his attorneys of record, HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that 3 the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint shall be extended to November 7, 2014. 4 This agreement will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court Order. 5 6 7 Date: September 29, 2014 SIMPSON, GARRITY, INNES & JACUZZI Professional Corporation` 8 By: /s/ Paul V. Simpson PAUL V. SIMPSON, BAR NO. 83878 H. ANN LIROFF, BAR NO. 113180 SARAH E. LUCAS, BAR NO. 148713 Attorneys for Plaintiff Gifford Ludwigsen 9 10 11 12 Date: September 29, 2014 SHERMAN & HOWARD L.L.C. 13 By: /s/ John Alan Doran John Alan Doran Attorney for Defendant NPL Construction Co. 14 15 16 17 indicated by a conformed signature (/S/) within this e-filed document. ER ERED seph C. R NIA Judge Jo H 26 RT 25 NO 24 O ORD IT IS S Spero FO 23 UNIT ED 22 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O 21 Dated: 10/1/14 S 20 LI 19 I hereby attest that I have on file all holographic signatures corresponding to any signatures A 18 N F D IS T IC T O R C 27 28 {CLIENT FILES/11338/11/00304441.DOCX} STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT NPL CONSTRUCTION CO. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT -2- 1 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL 2 3 4 I, the undersigned, hereby declare that I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action. My business address is Simpson, Garrity, Innes & Jacuzzi Professional Corporation, 601 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 950, South San Francisco, CA 94080. 5 6 On the date indicated below, I served by mail a true copy of the following documents: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT NPL CONSTRUCTION CO. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT I am readily familiar with the practice of this business for collection and processing of documents for mailing with the United States Postal Service. Documents so collected and processed are placed for collection and deposit with the United States Postal Service that same day in the ordinary course of business. The above-referenced document(s) were placed in (a) sealed envelope(s) with postage thereon fully prepaid, addressed to each of the below listed parties and such envelope(s) was (were) placed for collection and deposit with the United States Postal Service on the date listed below at South San Francisco, California: 15 John Alan Doran 16 Sherman & Howard L.L.C. 17 201 East Washington Street, Suite 800 Phoenix, Arizona 85004 18 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the 19 foregoing is true and correct. 20 Executed on September 29, 2014, at South San Francisco, California. 21 /s/ Danielle Monrroy 22 Danielle Monrroy 23 24 25 26 27 28 {CLIENT FILES/11338/11/00304441.DOCX} STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT NPL CONSTRUCTION CO. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?