Gifford Ludwigsen v. NPL Construction Co.
Filing
8
ORDER GRANTING re 7 Stipulation to Extend Time For Defendant NPL to Respond to Complaint filed by Gifford Ludwigsen. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 10/1/14. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2014)
1
PAUL V. SIMPSON, BAR NO. 83878
2 H. ANN LIROFF, BAR NO. 113180
SARAH E. LUCAS, BAR NO. 148713
3 SIMPSON, GARRITY, INNES & JACUZZI
Professional Corporation
4 601 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 950
South San Francisco, California 94080
5 Telephone: (650) 615-4860
Fax: (650) 615-4861
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
7 Gifford Ludwigsen
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
GIFFORD LUDWIGSEN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
NPL CONSTRUCTION CO., a Nevada
15 Corporation,
Defendant.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 14-cv-04104 JCS
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANT NPL CONSTRUCTION
CO. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{CLIENT FILES/11338/11/00304441.DOCX}
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT NPL CONSTRUCTION CO. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
-1-
1
Defendant NPL Construction Co. (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff Gifford Ludwigsen
2 (“Plaintiff”), by and through his attorneys of record, HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that
3
the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint shall be extended to November 7, 2014.
4
This agreement will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court Order.
5
6
7
Date: September 29, 2014
SIMPSON, GARRITY, INNES & JACUZZI
Professional Corporation`
8
By: /s/ Paul V. Simpson
PAUL V. SIMPSON, BAR NO. 83878
H. ANN LIROFF, BAR NO. 113180
SARAH E. LUCAS, BAR NO. 148713
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Gifford Ludwigsen
9
10
11
12
Date: September 29, 2014
SHERMAN & HOWARD L.L.C.
13
By: /s/ John Alan Doran
John Alan Doran
Attorney for Defendant
NPL Construction Co.
14
15
16
17
indicated by a conformed signature (/S/) within this e-filed document.
ER
ERED
seph C.
R NIA
Judge Jo
H
26
RT
25
NO
24
O ORD
IT IS S
Spero
FO
23
UNIT
ED
22
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
21 Dated: 10/1/14
S
20
LI
19
I hereby attest that I have on file all holographic signatures corresponding to any signatures
A
18
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
27
28
{CLIENT FILES/11338/11/00304441.DOCX}
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT NPL CONSTRUCTION CO. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
-2-
1
PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL
2
3
4
I, the undersigned, hereby declare that I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party
to the within action. My business address is Simpson, Garrity, Innes & Jacuzzi Professional
Corporation, 601 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 950, South San Francisco, CA 94080.
5
6 On the date indicated below, I served by mail a true copy of the following documents:
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT NPL CONSTRUCTION CO. TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
I am readily familiar with the practice of this business for collection and processing of
documents for mailing with the United States Postal Service. Documents so collected and
processed are placed for collection and deposit with the United States Postal Service that same day
in the ordinary course of business. The above-referenced document(s) were placed in (a) sealed
envelope(s) with postage thereon fully prepaid, addressed to each of the below listed parties and
such envelope(s) was (were) placed for collection and deposit with the United States Postal
Service on the date listed below at South San Francisco, California:
15
John Alan Doran
16 Sherman & Howard L.L.C.
17 201 East Washington Street, Suite 800
Phoenix, Arizona 85004
18
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
19
foregoing is true and correct.
20
Executed on September 29, 2014, at South San Francisco, California.
21
/s/ Danielle Monrroy
22
Danielle Monrroy
23
24
25
26
27
28
{CLIENT FILES/11338/11/00304441.DOCX}
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT NPL CONSTRUCTION CO. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?