Kenu, Inc. v. eBay Inc et al

Filing 98

Order by Hon. James Donato granting plaintiff Kenu Inc.'s 96 Motion for Default Judgment. The Court, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), vacates the hearing that was set for October 13, 2016, and grants plaintiff's motion on the papers. (jdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP Marcus T. Hall, Bar No. 206495 marcus.hall@troutmansanders.com Dean A. Morehous, Bar No. 111841 dean.morehous@troutmansanders.com Craig C. Crockett, Bar. No. 265161 craig.crockett@troutmansanders.com San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415.477.5700 Facsimile: 415.477.5710 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff KENU, INC. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KENU, INC., Case No. 14-CV-04113-JD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING KENU’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 14 EBAY INC. et al., [Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)] 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 T ROU T MA N S ANDE RS LLP 580 CALIFORNIA STREET, 11TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING KENU’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT CASE NO. 14-CV-04113-JD 1 This matter has come before the Court on Kenu’s Motion for Default Judgment against 2 defendants Ali Chance (originally sued as eBay user known as “ayagroup”), Vladislav 3 Doroshenko (originally sued as eBay user known as “allyexporter”), and LGC Gas Equipment 4 (HK) Co., Limited (together, “Defendants”). Dkt. No. 96. After considering the papers and all 5 evidence submitted, and after considering the factors discussed in Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 6 1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir.1986), 7 8 9 10 IT IS ORDERED that Kenu’s Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED, and that judgment will be entered against Defendants for each of Kenu’s claims for relief. A permanent injunction is hereby entered against Defendants as follows: a. Enjoining and restraining Defendants, their officers, agents, servants, 11 representatives, employees, attorneys, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, related companies, 12 partners, successors, predecessors, assigns and all persons acting for, with, by, through or under 13 them, and each of them, from: 14 i. manufacturing, shipping, selling, offering for sale, exposing for sale, holding 15 for sale, advertising, or promoting or otherwise moving, storing or disposing 16 of in any manner any device for holding electronic products that are alleged to 17 infringe Kenu’s U.S. Design Patent No. D960,707 (the “’707 patent”), or to 18 falsely bear the product design trade dress of the Kenu AIRFRAME product 19 (the “Kenu Trade Dress”), or bearing the names “WINDFRAME”, 20 “AiIRFRAME”, or “AIRFRAME”, or any reproduction, counterfeit, copy or 21 colorable imitation of same; 22 ii. using the designs of the ‘707 Patent, the Kenu Trade Dress, or the 23 “AIRFRAME” trademark, or any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable 24 imitation thereof, in connection with the distribution, advertising, offer for 25 sale, exposure for sale, and/or sale of merchandise not the genuine products of 26 Kenu; 27 28 T ROU T MA N S ANDE RS LLP 580 CALIFORNIA STREET, 11TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 iii. using the designs of the ‘707 Patent, the Kenu Trade Dress, or the “AIRFRAME” trademark, or any reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING KENU’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT -2- CASE NO. 14-CV-04113-JD 1 imitation thereof in connection with the www.ebay.com website, other online 2 services or activities, or any other goods or services not the genuine products 3 of Kenu, in a manner that is likely to cause confusion, mistake, deception, or 4 public misunderstanding that such website, other online services or activities, 5 or other goods or services are produced or provided by Kenu, or are 6 sponsored or authorized by or in any way connected or related to Kenu; 7 iv. passing off, inducing or enabling others to sell or pass off any products that 8 infringe the ‘707 Patent, the Kenu Trade Dress, or the “AIRFRAME” 9 trademark; 10 v. operating and/or hosting any website or webpage, or otherwise providing 11 services enabling the sale, exposure for sale, or offer for sale of any products 12 that infringe the ‘707 Patent, falsely bear the Kenu Trade Dress, or infringe 13 the “AIRFRAME” trademark; and 14 vi. otherwise infringing the ‘707 Patent, Kenu Trade Dress, or “AIRFRAME” 15 trademark, or infringing other Kenu intellectual property, damaging Kenu’s 16 goodwill or otherwise competing unfairly with Kenu in any manner; 17 Defendants are hereby given further notice they shall be deemed to have actual notice of 18 the issuance and terms of such Permanent Injunction and any act by them or any one of them in 19 violation of any of the terms thereof may be considered and prosecuted as contempt of this 20 Court. 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 289(2), Kenu is 22 entitled to statutory damages in the amount of $250 from each of the Defendants for 23 infringement of the ‘707 patent. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 12, 2016 26 27 United States District Judge James Donato 28 T ROU T MA N S ANDE RS LLP 580 CALIFORNIA STREET, 11TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING KENU’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT -3- CASE NO. 14-CV-04113-JD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?