Harris v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Filing
16
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 15 Stipulation to Continue Response Dates and Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and Initial Case Management Conference.(knmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2014)
1
5
SHAUN SETAREH
TUVIA KOROBKIN
ALICE KIM
SETAREH LAW GROUP
9454 Wilshire Blvd.
Suite 907
Beverly Hills, California 90212
Tel No.: (310) 888-7771
Fax No.: (310) 888-0109
6
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7
DONNA M. MEZIAS (SBN 111902)
LIZ K. BERTKO (SBN 268128)
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
580 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415-765-9500
Facsimile: 415-765-9501
dmezias@akingump.com
lbertko@akingump.com
2
3
4
8
9
10
11
12
13
Attorneys for Defendant
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
TERRIA HARRIS, on behalf of
herself, and all others similarly
situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., a
Delaware corporation; and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.
Case No. 14-cv-04206-VC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE
DATES AND HEARING ON
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
REMAND AND INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Judge: Hon. Vince Chhabria
Date:
January 22, 2015
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Courtroom: 4
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATES AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO REMAND AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
STIPULATION
1
2
1.
On August 15, 2014, this putative class action was filed in the Superior
3
Court of California, County of Alameda, Case No. RG14737071. Defendant removed
4
the action to the Northern District of California on September 17, 2014.
5
2.
On December 12, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion for remand. Defendant’s
6
opposition is currently due December 26, 2014, and plaintiff’s reply is due on January 2,
7
2015. The motion hearing is set for January 22, 2015.
8
9
10
11
12
3.
Counsel for defendant will be on vacation from December 24, 2014, until
January 5, 2015.
4.
Therefore, the parties have agreed to continue the dates for the responsive
briefs and hearing by two weeks.
5.
The initial Case Management Conference in this case is scheduled for
13
February 3, 2015. For efficiency, the parties further request that the Case Management
14
Conference be held at the same time as the hearing on plaintiff’s motion to remand.
15
NOW, THEREFORE, plaintiff and defendant, by and through their respective
16
17
counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1.
That the briefing and hearing schedule shall be continued for two weeks, as
18
follows: defendant’s opposition will be due on January 9, 2015, plaintiff’s reply will be
19
due on January 16, 2015, and the hearing on the motion shall be continued to February
20
5, 2015.
21
2.
22
That the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for February 3,
2015, at 10:00 a.m. be held on February 5, 2015 at 10:00 a.m.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATES AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO REMAND AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
Dated: December 19, 2014
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
2
By: /S/ Donna M. Mezias
Donna M. Mezias
Attorneys for defendant
3
4
5
6
Dated: December 19, 2014
SETAREH LAW GROUP
7
8
9
By: /S/ Shaun Setareh
Shaun Setareh
Attorneys for plaintiff
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATES AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO REMAND AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Hearing
3
on plaintiff’s Motion to Remand shall be continued to February 5, at 10:00 a.m., in
4
Courtroom 4 of this Court. Accordingly, defendant’s opposition will be due on January
5
9, 2015, and plaintiff’s reply will be due on January 16, 2015. It is further ordered that
6
the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for February 3, 2015, at 10:00
7
a.m. continued to February 5, 2015 at 10:00 a.m.
8
9
19
Dated: December __, 2014
10
11
12
13
______________________________
Honorable Vince Chhabria
United State District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATES AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO REMAND AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
3
I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the
age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is: 580 California
Street, Suite 1500, San Francisco, California 94104. On December 19, 2014, I served
the foregoing document(s) described as:
4
5
6
7
8
9
1. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED1 ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE
DATES AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND AND
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; and
2. DECLARATION OF DONNA M. MEZIAS RE STIPULATION AND
PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATES AND HEARING
ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND AND INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE,
10
on the interested party(ies) below, using the following means:
11
All parties identified for Notice of Electronic Filing
generated by the Court's CM/ECF system under the
referenced case caption and number
12
13
14
BY ELECTRONIC MAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION. Based on a court
order or an agreement of the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic
transmission, I caused the document(s) to be sent to the respective e-mail address(es) of
the party(ies) as stated above. I did not receive within a reasonable time after the
transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was
unsuccessful.
,
15
16
17
Executed on December 19, 2014 at San Francisco, California.
18
19
Jeremias V. Cordero
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?