Harris v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Filing 16

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 15 Stipulation to Continue Response Dates and Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and Initial Case Management Conference.(knmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2014)

Download PDF
1 5 SHAUN SETAREH TUVIA KOROBKIN ALICE KIM SETAREH LAW GROUP 9454 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 907 Beverly Hills, California 90212 Tel No.: (310) 888-7771 Fax No.: (310) 888-0109 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 DONNA M. MEZIAS (SBN 111902) LIZ K. BERTKO (SBN 268128) AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 580 California Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415-765-9500 Facsimile: 415-765-9501 dmezias@akingump.com lbertko@akingump.com 2 3 4 8 9 10 11 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TERRIA HARRIS, on behalf of herself, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. 14-cv-04206-VC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATES AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Judge: Hon. Vince Chhabria Date: January 22, 2015 Time: 10:00 a.m. Courtroom: 4 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATES AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STIPULATION 1 2 1. On August 15, 2014, this putative class action was filed in the Superior 3 Court of California, County of Alameda, Case No. RG14737071. Defendant removed 4 the action to the Northern District of California on September 17, 2014. 5 2. On December 12, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion for remand. Defendant’s 6 opposition is currently due December 26, 2014, and plaintiff’s reply is due on January 2, 7 2015. The motion hearing is set for January 22, 2015. 8 9 10 11 12 3. Counsel for defendant will be on vacation from December 24, 2014, until January 5, 2015. 4. Therefore, the parties have agreed to continue the dates for the responsive briefs and hearing by two weeks. 5. The initial Case Management Conference in this case is scheduled for 13 February 3, 2015. For efficiency, the parties further request that the Case Management 14 Conference be held at the same time as the hearing on plaintiff’s motion to remand. 15 NOW, THEREFORE, plaintiff and defendant, by and through their respective 16 17 counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. That the briefing and hearing schedule shall be continued for two weeks, as 18 follows: defendant’s opposition will be due on January 9, 2015, plaintiff’s reply will be 19 due on January 16, 2015, and the hearing on the motion shall be continued to February 20 5, 2015. 21 2. 22 That the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for February 3, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. be held on February 5, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATES AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 Dated: December 19, 2014 AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 2 By: /S/ Donna M. Mezias Donna M. Mezias Attorneys for defendant 3 4 5 6 Dated: December 19, 2014 SETAREH LAW GROUP 7 8 9 By: /S/ Shaun Setareh Shaun Setareh Attorneys for plaintiff 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATES AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Hearing 3 on plaintiff’s Motion to Remand shall be continued to February 5, at 10:00 a.m., in 4 Courtroom 4 of this Court. Accordingly, defendant’s opposition will be due on January 5 9, 2015, and plaintiff’s reply will be due on January 16, 2015. It is further ordered that 6 the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for February 3, 2015, at 10:00 7 a.m. continued to February 5, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. 8 9 19 Dated: December __, 2014 10 11 12 13 ______________________________ Honorable Vince Chhabria United State District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATES AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is: 580 California Street, Suite 1500, San Francisco, California 94104. On December 19, 2014, I served the foregoing document(s) described as: 4 5 6 7 8 9 1. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED1 ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATES AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; and 2. DECLARATION OF DONNA M. MEZIAS RE STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATES AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, 10 on the interested party(ies) below, using the following means: 11 All parties identified for Notice of Electronic Filing generated by the Court's CM/ECF system under the referenced case caption and number 12 13 14 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION. Based on a court order or an agreement of the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic transmission, I caused the document(s) to be sent to the respective e-mail address(es) of the party(ies) as stated above. I did not receive within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. , 15 16 17 Executed on December 19, 2014 at San Francisco, California. 18 19 Jeremias V. Cordero 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?