Poor et al v. The Pasquan Limited Partnership, LLP et al

Filing 26

SCHEDULING ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 12/5/2014. Fact Discovery due by 8/7/2015. Expert Disclosures due by 10/30/2015. Expert Rebuttal due by 11/20/2015. Expert Discovery due by 12/18/2015. Dispositive Motions due by 10/23/2015. Pretri al Conference Statement due by 1/5/2016. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/15/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Trial set for 2/1/2016 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 7, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2015)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

LENETTE POOR, et al.,

Case No. 14-cv-04264-JST

Plaintiffs,
9
v.

SCHEDULING ORDER

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

THE PASQUAN LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, LLP, et al.,
Defendants.

12
13
14
15

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

16
Event

Deadline

17
Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings

December 5, 2014

Fact discovery cut-off

August 7, 2015

20

Expert disclosures

October 30, 2015

21

Expert rebuttal

November 20, 2015

22

Expert discovery cut-off

December 18, 2015

Deadline to file dispositive motions

October 23, 2015

Pretrial conference statement due

January 5, 2016

Pretrial conference

January 15, 2016 at
2:00 p.m.

Trial

February 1, 2016 at
8:30 a.m.

18
19

23
24
25
26
27
28

1
2
3

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with
the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.
The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire

4

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely

5

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their

6

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.

7

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are
disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party-

9

controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant

10

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

8

to grant a continuance.

12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 7, 2015

14
15
16

_______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2