Wickey v. Hsu et al
Filing
54
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Show Cause Response due by 10/2/2015. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 10/1/2015. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2015)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
IN RE IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC.
SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE
LITIGATION
9
Case No. 14-cv-04266-HSG
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
On September 3, 2015, the Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’
15
verified consolidated shareholder derivative complaint with leave to amend and directed Plaintiffs
16
to file an amended complaint within 21 days. Dkt. No. 53. The deadline to file an amended
17
complaint has passed. By October 2, 2015, Plaintiffs must file a statement of no more than three
18
pages explaining why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 1, 2015
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
