Dragu v. Motion Picture Industry Health Plan for Active Participants

Filing 14

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/16/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6

WILLIAM A. SOKOL, Bar No. 072740
EZEKIEL D. CARDER, Bar No. 206537
KRISTINA M. ZINNEN, Bar No. 245346
WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD
A Professional Corporation
1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200
Alameda, California 94501
Telephone [phone]
Fax [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

7
8

Attorneys for Defendant

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

No. 3:14-cv-04268 RS

ELISE DRAGU,

12

Plaintiff,

13
v.
14
15

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR
OTHERWISE RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH
PLAN FOR ACTIVE PARTICIPANTS,

16
Defendant.

17
18
19

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12, and Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Elise

20

Dragu (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Motion Picture Industry Health Plan for Active Participants

21

(“Defendant”) hereby stipulate to extend the time within which Defendant has to answer or

22

otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint.

23

Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action on September 22, 2014. With this Stipulation,

24

Defendant’s deadline for answering and or otherwise responding to the Complaint is extended to

25

January 9, 2015.

26
27
28
WEINBERG, ROGER &
ROSENFELD
A Professional Corporation
1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200
Alameda, California 94501
[phone]

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-04268 RS
137304/791309

1
2

The parties also agree that pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), this stipulation is respectfully
submitted to the Court for approval without the necessity of a hearing.

3
4

Dated: December 15, 2014

5

WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD
A Professional Corporation

6
7

By: /s/ Kristina M. Zinnen
KRISTINA M. ZINNEN
Attorneys for Defendant

8
9

Dated: December 15, 2014

10
11

By: /s/ James P. Keenley
JAMES P. KEENLEY
Attorneys for Plaintiff

12
13
14

[PROPOSED] ORDER

15

It is so ordered that the Stipulation extending the time for Defendant to answer or

16

otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is entered in this matter, as set forth above. In

17

addition, the Court orders:

18
19

Dated: ______________________, 2014
12/16

20
_________________________________
THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WEINBERG, ROGER &
ROSENFELD
A Professional Corporation
1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200
Alameda, California 94501
[phone]

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-04268 RS
137304/791309