Dragu v. Motion Picture Industry Health Plan for Active Participants

Filing 32

CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER, Case referred to mediation. Motion Hearing set for 10/22/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/12/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

ELISE DRAGU,

Case No. 14-cv-04268-RS

Plaintiff,
8
v.

CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING
ORDER

9
10

MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH
PLAN FOR ACTIVE PARTICIPANTS,
Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties attended a Case

13

Management Conference on March 12, 2015. After considering the Joint Case Management

14

Statement submitted by the parties and consulting with the attorneys of record for the parties and

15

good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

16

1.

17

MEDIATION: The parties are hereby REFERRED to the court’s ADR department for the

18

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION.

purpose of engaging in mediation to take place, ideally, within the next 60 days.

19

2.

20

Discovery disputes will be referred to a Magistrate Judge. After the parties have met and

21

conferred, the parties shall prepare a joint letter of not more than 8 pages explaining the dispute.

22

Up to 12 pages of attachments may be added. The joint letter must be electronically filed under

23

the Civil Events category of "Motions and Related Filings >Motions--General > Discovery Letter

24

Brief." The Magistrate Judge to whom the matter is assigned will advise the parties of how that

25

Judge intends to proceed. The Magistrate Judge may issue a ruling, order more formal briefing, or

26

set a telephone conference or a hearing. After a Magistrate Judge has been assigned, all further

27

discovery matters shall be filed pursuant to that Judge’s procedures.

28

DISCOVERY DISPUTES.

1

3.

2

All dispositive pretrial motions must be filed and served pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.

3

The parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment shall be heard on October 22, 2015, at 1:30

4

p.m. in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San

5

Francisco, California.

6

PRETRIAL MOTIONS.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8
9
10

Dated: March 12, 2015
______________________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER
CASE NO. 14-cv-04268-RS

28
2