Fair Housing of Marin v. Professional Financial Investors, Inc. et al

Filing 31

ORDER granting 30 STIPULATION FOR BRIEF CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Conference continued to 8/18/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/11/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 STEPHEN M. DANE* D. SCOTT CHANG #146403 RELMAN, DANE & COLFAX PLLC 1225 19th Street NW, Suite 600 Washington D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 728-1888 Facsimile: (202) 728-0848 schang@relmanlaw.com 5 *Admitted Pro Hac Vice 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff FAIR HOUSING OF MARIN ROBERT DISKINT #88232 CRITCHLOW & DISKINT LLP 1050 Northgate Dr., Suite 420 San Rafael, CA 94903 Telephone: (415) 925-1000 Facsimile: (415) 925-0444 Attorney for Defendants PROFESSIONAL FINANCIAL INVESTORS INC., PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS SECURITY FUND VII; PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS SECURITY FUND XIV; PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS SECURITY FUND XV 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) PROFESSIONAL FINANCIAL ) INVESTORS, INC., a California corporation; ) PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS SECURITY ) FUND VII, a California Limited Partnership; ) PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS SECURITY ) FUND XIV, a California Limited Partnership; ) and PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS ) SECURITY FUND XV, a California Limited ) Partnership; ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) FAIR HOUSING OF MARIN, a California non-profit corporation; Case No.: 3:14-cv-04282-WHO JOINT APPLICATION AND STIPULATION FOR BRIEF CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT APPLICATION AND STIPULATION FOR CONTINANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 3:14-cv-04282-WHO 1 The parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby apply for 2 and stipulate to a seven (7) day extension of the Case Management Conference presently scheduled 3 for August 11, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. There is good cause to grant the parties’ application for a 4 continuance because the parties have finalized agreements resolving the case. The parties have 5 been unable to obtain final approval of one of the principals because of health issues. The parties 6 expect to be able to file a stipulation of dismissal within seven (7) days of August 11, 2015. 7 In the alternative, the parties request permission to attend the case management conference 8 by telephone. 9 Dated: August 10, 2015 10 RELMAN, DANE & COLFAX PLLC 1225 19th Street NW, Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 728-1888 Facsimile: (202) 728-0848 schang@relmanlaw.com 11 12 13 By /s/ D. Scott Chang Attorney for Fair Housing of Marin 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Dated: August 10, 2015 ROBERT DISKINT #88232 CRITCHLOW & DISKINT LLP 1050 Northgate Dr., Suite 420 San Rafael, CA 9490 Telephone: (415) 925-1000 Facsimile: (415) 925-0444 By /s/ Robert Diskint Attorney for Professional Financial Investors, Inc.; Professional Investors Security Fund VII; Professional Investors Security Fund XIV; Professional Investors Security Fund XV 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 2 JOINT APPLICATION AND STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER; CASE NO. 3:14-cv-04282-WHO ORDER 1 2 Having considered the parties’ joint application and stipulation for a continuance of the Case 3 Management Conference, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court grants the parties’ joint 4 application for a continuance of the Case Management Conference. The parties shall appear for a 5 further Case Management Conference on August 18, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. 6 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: August 11, 2015 8 9 William H. Orrick United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 3 - JOINT APPLICATION AND STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER; CASE NO. 3:14-cv-04282-WHO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?