Fair Housing of Marin v. Professional Financial Investors, Inc. et al
Filing
31
ORDER granting 30 STIPULATION FOR BRIEF CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Conference continued to 8/18/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/11/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2015)
1
2
3
4
STEPHEN M. DANE*
D. SCOTT CHANG #146403
RELMAN, DANE & COLFAX PLLC
1225 19th Street NW, Suite 600
Washington D.C. 20036
Telephone: (202) 728-1888
Facsimile: (202) 728-0848
schang@relmanlaw.com
5
*Admitted Pro Hac Vice
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FAIR HOUSING OF MARIN
ROBERT DISKINT #88232
CRITCHLOW & DISKINT LLP
1050 Northgate Dr., Suite 420
San Rafael, CA 94903
Telephone: (415) 925-1000
Facsimile: (415) 925-0444
Attorney for Defendants
PROFESSIONAL FINANCIAL INVESTORS
INC., PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS
SECURITY FUND VII; PROFESSIONAL
INVESTORS SECURITY FUND XIV;
PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS SECURITY
FUND XV
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
PROFESSIONAL FINANCIAL
)
INVESTORS, INC., a California corporation; )
PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS SECURITY )
FUND VII, a California Limited Partnership; )
PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS SECURITY )
FUND XIV, a California Limited Partnership; )
and PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS
)
SECURITY FUND XV, a California Limited )
Partnership;
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
FAIR HOUSING OF MARIN, a California
non-profit corporation;
Case No.: 3:14-cv-04282-WHO
JOINT APPLICATION AND
STIPULATION FOR BRIEF
CONTINUANCE OF CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
ORDER
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT APPLICATION AND STIPULATION FOR CONTINANCE OF
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 3:14-cv-04282-WHO
1
The parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby apply for
2
and stipulate to a seven (7) day extension of the Case Management Conference presently scheduled
3
for August 11, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. There is good cause to grant the parties’ application for a
4
continuance because the parties have finalized agreements resolving the case. The parties have
5
been unable to obtain final approval of one of the principals because of health issues. The parties
6
expect to be able to file a stipulation of dismissal within seven (7) days of August 11, 2015.
7
In the alternative, the parties request permission to attend the case management conference
8
by telephone.
9
Dated: August 10, 2015
10
RELMAN, DANE & COLFAX PLLC
1225 19th Street NW, Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20036
Telephone: (202) 728-1888
Facsimile: (202) 728-0848
schang@relmanlaw.com
11
12
13
By /s/ D. Scott Chang
Attorney for Fair Housing of Marin
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Dated: August 10, 2015
ROBERT DISKINT #88232
CRITCHLOW & DISKINT LLP
1050 Northgate Dr., Suite 420
San Rafael, CA 9490
Telephone: (415) 925-1000
Facsimile: (415) 925-0444
By /s/ Robert Diskint
Attorney for Professional Financial Investors, Inc.;
Professional Investors Security Fund VII; Professional
Investors Security Fund XIV; Professional Investors
Security Fund XV
23
24
25
26
27
28
- 2 JOINT APPLICATION AND STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER;
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-04282-WHO
ORDER
1
2
Having considered the parties’ joint application and stipulation for a continuance of the Case
3
Management Conference, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court grants the parties’ joint
4
application for a continuance of the Case Management Conference. The parties shall appear for a
5
further Case Management Conference on August 18, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.
6
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated: August 11, 2015
8
9
William H. Orrick
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- 3 -
JOINT APPLICATION AND STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER;
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-04282-WHO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?