Nichols Karant v. Larry Hsu et al

Filing 35

ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting 33 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Continuing Initial Disclosures Pending the Court's Order on the Pending Motions to Dismiss (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Peter A. Wald (Bar No. 85705)
Marcy C. Priedeman (Bar No. 258505)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Patrick E. Gibbs (Bar No. 183174)
[e-mail]
140 Scott Drive
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

9

12

Attorneys for Defendants
LARRY HSU, ARTHUR A. KOCH, BRYAN M.
REASONS, ROBERT L. BURR, LESLIE Z.
BENET, ALLEN CHAO, NIGEL TEN FLEMING,
MICHAEL MARKBREITER and PETER R.
TERRERI

13

and

14

Nominal Defendant IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC

15

[Additional Counsel on Signature Page]

10
11

16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18
19

NICHOLAS KARANT, Derivatively on
Behalf of Nominal Defendant IMPAX
LABORATORIES, INC.

20
21
22
23
24

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 14-cv-04313-SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING INITIAL DISCLOSURES
PENDING THE COURT’S ORDER ON THE
PENDING MOTIONS TO DISMISS

vs.
LARRY HSU, ARTHUR A. KOCH, BRYAN
M. REASONS, ROBERT L. BURR, LESLIE
Z. BENET, ALLEN CHAO, NIGEL TEN
FLEMING, MICHAEL MARKBREITER
and PETER R. TERRERI

Date:
Time:
Location:
Judge:

Courtroom 10
Honorable Susan Ilston

25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

Defendants.
IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC.,
Nominal Defendant.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING INITIAL DISCLOSURES
CASE NUMBER: 14-cv-04313-SI

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

WHEREAS, on September 24, 2014, Plaintiff Nicholas Karant (“Plaintiff”) filed the
above captioned shareholder derivative action (the “Action”) on behalf of Nominal Defendant
Impax Laboratories, Inc. (“Impax” or the “Company”) against Individual Defendants Larry Hsu,
Arthur A.Koch, Bryan M. Reasons, Robert L. Burr, Leslie Z. Benet, Allen Chao, Nigel Ten
Fleming, Michael Markbreiter, and Peter R. Terreri (the “Individual Defendants”);
WHEREAS, on December 15, 2014, Impax and the Individual Defendants filed their
respective Motions to Dismiss the Complaint (Dkt. Nos. 25, 26);
WHEREAS, on January 9, 2015, Plaintiff’s and Defendants’ (the “Parties”) Initial
Disclosures are due;
WHEREAS, on March 13, 2015, the Court is to hear oral argument on the Motions to
Dismiss;
WHEREAS, for the sake of efficiency and mindful of the Court’s and Parties’ resources,
the Parties have agreed to continue the Parties’ Initial Disclosures until after the Court has ruled
on Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss.
Accordingly, it is hereby stipulated between the Parties, as follows:
1.

The Parties shall file their respective initial disclosures no later than 30 days

following the Court’s ruling on the Motions to Dismiss.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: January 6, 2015

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C.

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

By: __ /S/ Kathleen A. Herkenhoff _______
Kathleen A. Herkenhoff

By: __/s/ Peter A. Wald___________________
Peter A. Wald

Kathleen A. Herkenhoff
12707 High Bluff Drive, Suite 200
San Diego, CA 92130
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C.
Counsel for Plaintiff

Peter A. Wald
Marcy C. Priedeman
505 Montgomery St., Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING INITIAL DISCLOSURES
CASE NUMBER: 14-cv-04313-SI

1

and

2

Patrick E. Gibbs
140 Scott Drive
Menlo Park, California 94025-1008
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

3
4
5

Attorneys for Defendants Larry Hsu, Arthur A.
Koch, Bryan M. Reasons, Robert L. Burr, Leslie
Z. Benet, Allen Chao, Nigel Ten Fleming,
Michael Markbreiter, Peter R. Tereri and
Nominal Defendant Impax Laboratories, Inc.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

ORDER
Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
14
15

1/8/14
DATED:______________
_______________________
HON. SUSAN ILLSTON

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING INITIAL DISCLOSURES
CASE NUMBER: 14-cv-04313-SI

1
2

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing

3

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Initial Disclosures Pending the Court’s Order on

4

the Pending Motions to Dismiss. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I,

5

Peter A. Wald, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.

6
7
8

DATED: January 6, 2015

__/s/ Peter A. Wald______________
Peter A. Wald

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING INITIAL DISCLOSURES
CASE NUMBER: 14-cv-04313-SI