Nichols Karant v. Larry Hsu et al
Filing
42
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 41 Stipulation Resetting Hearing Date on Motions to Dismiss and Adjusting Related Briefing Deadlines. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2015)
1 THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C.
KATHLEEN A. HERKENHOFF (168562)
2 12707 High Bluff Drive, Suite 200
San Diego, CA 92130
3 Telephone: (858) 794-1441
Facsimile: (858) 794-1450
4 kah@weiserlawfirm.com
5 Attorneys for Plaintiff
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11 NICHOLAS KARANT, Derivatively on
Behalf of Nominal Defendant IMPAX
12 LABORATORIES, INC,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
LARRY HSU, ARTHUR A. KOCH, BRYAN )
M. REASONS, ROBERT L. BURR, LESLIE )
Z. BENET, ALLEN CHAO, NIGEL TEN
)
FLEMING, MICHAEL MARKBREITER and )
PETER R. TERRERI,
)
)
Defendants,
)
)
– and –
)
)
IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC.,
)
)
Nominal Party.
)
)
Case No. 14-CV-04313-HSG
STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING
HEARING DATE ON MOTIONS TO
DISMISS AND ADJUSTING RELATED
BRIEFING DEADLINES
DATE:
TIME:
JUDGE:
TBD
TBD
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
1
WHEREAS, on September 24, 2014, Plaintiff Nicholas Karant filed the above-captioned
2 action alleging wrongful refusal of a shareholder litigation demand (the “Karant Action”);
3
WHEREAS, on October 22, 2014, the Honorable Susan Illston entered a Stipulation and
4 Order Concerning Defendants’ Time To Respond To Complaint (the “First Scheduling Order”),
5 which set a March 13, 2015 hearing date for any motions to dismiss or responses (including any
6 requests for judicial notice or motions to strike) to the operative pleading in the Karant Action
7 (collectively, the “Motions to Dismiss”), with briefing dates of December 15, 2014 for moving
8 papers, and February 11, 2015 for opposition papers (the “Opposition”);
WHEREAS, on February 4, 2015, a Related Case Order (the “Related Case Order”) issued in
9
10 the Karant Action, which related the Karant Action to two pending shareholder derivative actions
11 alleging demand futility on file in this District: Wickey v. Hsu, et al., Case No. 3:14-cv-04266-JD
12 and International Union of Operating Engineers Local 478 v. Hsu, et al., Case No. 3:14-cv-04980 –
13 JD);
14
WHEREAS, the Related Case Order vacated the March 13, 2015 hearing date on the Motions
15 to Dismiss noticed pursuant to the First Scheduling Order;
16
WHEREAS, on February 5, 2015, the Karant Action was reassigned to the Honorable James
17 Donato;
18
WHEREAS, on February 5, 2015, the parties agreed that a two week continuance of the
19 briefing dates on the Motions to Dismiss would be appropriate to conserve resources of the parties
20 and the Court, and to allow the parties to explore possible settlement of the Karant Action;
21
WHEREAS, on February 6, 2015, in view of the preliminary nature of the settlement
22 negotiations, the Court entered an order (Dkt. Nos. 39 & 40), which continued the date for Plaintiff
23 to file the Opposition to February 25, 2015, and continued the date for Defendants to submit a reply
24 (the “Reply”) to March 16, 2015, and set a hearing date on the Motions to Dismiss of April 22, 2015
25 (the “Hearing Date”);
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING HEARING DATE ON
MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND ADJUSTING RELATED BRIEFING DEADLINES - 14CV-04313-HSG
-1-
1
WHEREAS, on February 13, 2015, an Order Reassigning Case was entered, reassigning the
2 Karant Action to this Court, and vacating the newly set April 22, 2015 Hearing Date on the Motions
3 to Dismiss;
4
WHEREAS, in the period from at least February 6, 2015 to the present, the parties have
5 engaged in good faith in exploring their respective positions on settlement and related matters, which
6 efforts have included telephonic consultation with the Honorable Layn R. Phillips (Ret.) (“Judge
7 Phillips”), a private mediator, and the parties believe that, at this juncture, the briefing and hearing
8 schedule on the Motions to Dismiss should be continued for a brief additional period to permit the
9 parties sufficient additional time to determine if settlement is possible of the Karant Action, which
10 time may include further consultation with Judge Phillips;
11
ACCORDINGLY, the parties, through their undersigned counsel, hereby STIPULATE AS
12 FOLLOWS:
13
1.
The date for Plaintiff to file an Opposition is continued from February 25, 2015 to
14 March 4, 2015;
15
2.
The date for Defendants to submit a Reply in support of, the previously noticed
16 Motions to Dismiss is continued from March 16, 2015 to March 24, 2015; and
17
3.
The Hearing Date is hereby noticed for April 16, 2015, at 2:00 p.m., or such further
18 date and time as the Court orders.
19
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
20 DATED: February 23, 2015
21
THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C.
KATHLEEN A. HERKENHOFF (168562)
22
s/ KATHLEEN A. HERKENHOFF
KATHLEEN A. HERKENHOFF
23
24
12707 High Bluff Drive, Suite 200
San Diego, CA 92130
Telephone: (858) 794-1441
Facsimile: (858) 794-1450
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING HEARING DATE ON
MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND ADJUSTING RELATED BRIEFING DEADLINES - 14CV-04313-HSG
-2-
1
THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C.
ROBERT B. WEISER
BRETT D. STECKER
JEFFREY J. CIARLANTO
22 Cassatt Avenue, First Floor
Berwyn, PA 19312
Telephone: (610) 225-2677
Facsimile: (610) 408-8062
rw@weiserlawfirm.com
bds@weiserlawfirm.com
jjc@weiserlawfirm.com
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
RYAN & MANISKAS, LLP
KATHARINE RYAN
995 Old Eagle School Rd., Ste. 311
Wayne, PA 19087
Telephone: (484) 588-5516
Facsimile: (484) 450-2582
kryan@rmclasslaw.com
9
10
11
12
Counsel for Plaintiff
13
14 DATED: February 23, 2015
15
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
PETER A. WALD
MARCY C. PRIEDEMAN
16
/S/ Peter A. Wald
PETER A. WALD
17
18
505 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, CA
Telephone: 415/391-0600
peter.wald@lw.com
marcy.priedeman@lw.com
19
20
21
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
PATRICK E. GIBBS
140 Scott Drive
Menlo Park, California 94025-1008
Telephone: 650/328-4600
Facsimile: 650/463-2600
patrick.gibbs@lw.com
22
23
24
25
Attorneys for Defendants Larry Hsu, Arthur A.
Koch, Bryan M. Reasons, Robert L. Burr, Leslie
Z. Benet, Allen Chao, Nigel Ten Fleming,
Michael Markbreiter, Peter R. Tereri and Nominal
Defendant Impax Laboratories, Inc.
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING HEARING DATE ON
MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND ADJUSTING RELATED BRIEFING DEADLINES - 14CV-04313-HSG
-3-
1
*
*
*
2
ORDER
3
Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
DATED: February 24, 2015
5 _______________________
HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING HEARING DATE ON
MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND ADJUSTING RELATED BRIEFING DEADLINES - 14CV-04313-HSG
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?