Nichols Karant v. Larry Hsu et al

Filing 42

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 41 Stipulation Resetting Hearing Date on Motions to Dismiss and Adjusting Related Briefing Deadlines. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2015)

Download PDF
1 THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C. KATHLEEN A. HERKENHOFF (168562) 2 12707 High Bluff Drive, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92130 3 Telephone: (858) 794-1441 Facsimile: (858) 794-1450 4 kah@weiserlawfirm.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 NICHOLAS KARANT, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant IMPAX 12 LABORATORIES, INC, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) LARRY HSU, ARTHUR A. KOCH, BRYAN ) M. REASONS, ROBERT L. BURR, LESLIE ) Z. BENET, ALLEN CHAO, NIGEL TEN ) FLEMING, MICHAEL MARKBREITER and ) PETER R. TERRERI, ) ) Defendants, ) ) – and – ) ) IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., ) ) Nominal Party. ) ) Case No. 14-CV-04313-HSG STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING HEARING DATE ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND ADJUSTING RELATED BRIEFING DEADLINES DATE: TIME: JUDGE: TBD TBD Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 1 WHEREAS, on September 24, 2014, Plaintiff Nicholas Karant filed the above-captioned 2 action alleging wrongful refusal of a shareholder litigation demand (the “Karant Action”); 3 WHEREAS, on October 22, 2014, the Honorable Susan Illston entered a Stipulation and 4 Order Concerning Defendants’ Time To Respond To Complaint (the “First Scheduling Order”), 5 which set a March 13, 2015 hearing date for any motions to dismiss or responses (including any 6 requests for judicial notice or motions to strike) to the operative pleading in the Karant Action 7 (collectively, the “Motions to Dismiss”), with briefing dates of December 15, 2014 for moving 8 papers, and February 11, 2015 for opposition papers (the “Opposition”); WHEREAS, on February 4, 2015, a Related Case Order (the “Related Case Order”) issued in 9 10 the Karant Action, which related the Karant Action to two pending shareholder derivative actions 11 alleging demand futility on file in this District: Wickey v. Hsu, et al., Case No. 3:14-cv-04266-JD 12 and International Union of Operating Engineers Local 478 v. Hsu, et al., Case No. 3:14-cv-04980 – 13 JD); 14 WHEREAS, the Related Case Order vacated the March 13, 2015 hearing date on the Motions 15 to Dismiss noticed pursuant to the First Scheduling Order; 16 WHEREAS, on February 5, 2015, the Karant Action was reassigned to the Honorable James 17 Donato; 18 WHEREAS, on February 5, 2015, the parties agreed that a two week continuance of the 19 briefing dates on the Motions to Dismiss would be appropriate to conserve resources of the parties 20 and the Court, and to allow the parties to explore possible settlement of the Karant Action; 21 WHEREAS, on February 6, 2015, in view of the preliminary nature of the settlement 22 negotiations, the Court entered an order (Dkt. Nos. 39 & 40), which continued the date for Plaintiff 23 to file the Opposition to February 25, 2015, and continued the date for Defendants to submit a reply 24 (the “Reply”) to March 16, 2015, and set a hearing date on the Motions to Dismiss of April 22, 2015 25 (the “Hearing Date”); 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING HEARING DATE ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND ADJUSTING RELATED BRIEFING DEADLINES - 14CV-04313-HSG -1- 1 WHEREAS, on February 13, 2015, an Order Reassigning Case was entered, reassigning the 2 Karant Action to this Court, and vacating the newly set April 22, 2015 Hearing Date on the Motions 3 to Dismiss; 4 WHEREAS, in the period from at least February 6, 2015 to the present, the parties have 5 engaged in good faith in exploring their respective positions on settlement and related matters, which 6 efforts have included telephonic consultation with the Honorable Layn R. Phillips (Ret.) (“Judge 7 Phillips”), a private mediator, and the parties believe that, at this juncture, the briefing and hearing 8 schedule on the Motions to Dismiss should be continued for a brief additional period to permit the 9 parties sufficient additional time to determine if settlement is possible of the Karant Action, which 10 time may include further consultation with Judge Phillips; 11 ACCORDINGLY, the parties, through their undersigned counsel, hereby STIPULATE AS 12 FOLLOWS: 13 1. The date for Plaintiff to file an Opposition is continued from February 25, 2015 to 14 March 4, 2015; 15 2. The date for Defendants to submit a Reply in support of, the previously noticed 16 Motions to Dismiss is continued from March 16, 2015 to March 24, 2015; and 17 3. The Hearing Date is hereby noticed for April 16, 2015, at 2:00 p.m., or such further 18 date and time as the Court orders. 19 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 20 DATED: February 23, 2015 21 THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C. KATHLEEN A. HERKENHOFF (168562) 22 s/ KATHLEEN A. HERKENHOFF KATHLEEN A. HERKENHOFF 23 24 12707 High Bluff Drive, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92130 Telephone: (858) 794-1441 Facsimile: (858) 794-1450 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING HEARING DATE ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND ADJUSTING RELATED BRIEFING DEADLINES - 14CV-04313-HSG -2- 1 THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C. ROBERT B. WEISER BRETT D. STECKER JEFFREY J. CIARLANTO 22 Cassatt Avenue, First Floor Berwyn, PA 19312 Telephone: (610) 225-2677 Facsimile: (610) 408-8062 rw@weiserlawfirm.com bds@weiserlawfirm.com jjc@weiserlawfirm.com 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 RYAN & MANISKAS, LLP KATHARINE RYAN 995 Old Eagle School Rd., Ste. 311 Wayne, PA 19087 Telephone: (484) 588-5516 Facsimile: (484) 450-2582 kryan@rmclasslaw.com 9 10 11 12 Counsel for Plaintiff 13 14 DATED: February 23, 2015 15 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP PETER A. WALD MARCY C. PRIEDEMAN 16 /S/ Peter A. Wald PETER A. WALD 17 18 505 Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA Telephone: 415/391-0600 peter.wald@lw.com marcy.priedeman@lw.com 19 20 21 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP PATRICK E. GIBBS 140 Scott Drive Menlo Park, California 94025-1008 Telephone: 650/328-4600 Facsimile: 650/463-2600 patrick.gibbs@lw.com 22 23 24 25 Attorneys for Defendants Larry Hsu, Arthur A. Koch, Bryan M. Reasons, Robert L. Burr, Leslie Z. Benet, Allen Chao, Nigel Ten Fleming, Michael Markbreiter, Peter R. Tereri and Nominal Defendant Impax Laboratories, Inc. 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING HEARING DATE ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND ADJUSTING RELATED BRIEFING DEADLINES - 14CV-04313-HSG -3- 1 * * * 2 ORDER 3 Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 DATED: February 24, 2015 5 _______________________ HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING HEARING DATE ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND ADJUSTING RELATED BRIEFING DEADLINES - 14CV-04313-HSG -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?