Mihail Slavkov et al v. Fast Water Heater Partners I, LP et al
Filing
133
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 132 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Kevin Yarnell, Jose Alfredo Vazquez, Carlos Gomez, Arthur R. Siegel, Dale Weise, Mihail Slavkov, Francisco Magana, Nikola Vlaovic, Robert Gutierrez, Martin Arnaudov. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 9, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
John H. Douglas, Bar No. 178966
JDouglas@douglaslegal.com
DOUGLAS LAW OFFICES
100 Pine Street, Suite 1250
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 794-4751
Facsimile: (415) 795-3432
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
MIHAIL SLAVKOV, NIKOLA
VLAOVIC, MARTIN ARNAUDOV,
DALE WEISE, KEVIN YARNELL,
CARLOS GOMEZ, FRANCISCO
MAGANA, ROBERT GUTIERREZ AND
JOSE ALFREDO VASQUEZ,
INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF
THOSE SIMILARLY SITUATED,
Plaintiffs,
v.
FAST WATER HEATER PARTNERS I,
LP DBA FAST WATER HEATER
COMPANY, A DELAWARE LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP; FWH ACQUISITION
COMPANY, LLC DBA FAST WATER
HEATER COMPANY, A DELAWARE
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY;
JEFFREY DAVID JORDAN, AN
INDIVIDUAL; AND JASON SPARKS
HANLEYBROWN, AN INDIVIDUAL,
Defendants.
Case No. CV 14-4324 JST
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
JUDGE: HON. JON S. TIGAR
23
24
PURSUANT and subject to the terms of the Settlement approved by this Court on July 25,
25
2017 and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(2), Plaintiffs MIHAIL SLAVKOV,
26
NIKOLA VLAOVIC, MARTIN ARNAUDOV, DALE WEISE, KEVIN YARNELL, CARLOS
27
GOMEZ, FRANCISCO MAGANA, ROBERT GUTIERREZ AND JOSE ALREDO VASQUEZ
28
-1DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
CASE NO. CV-14-4324 JST
1
hereby request that the Court dismiss this action with prejudice.
2
3
Dated: November 6, 2017
DOUGLAS LAW OFFICES
4
/s/ John H. Douglas
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
[PROPOSED] ORDER
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Pursuant to the settlement of the parties hereto, this action is dismissed with prejudice.
The Court will retain jurisdiction over the matter and parties for purposes of enforcing the terms
of the settlement herein.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
DATED: November __, 2017
HON. JON S. TIGAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
CASE NO. CV-14-4324 JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?