Mihail Slavkov et al v. Fast Water Heater Partners I, LP et al

Filing 133

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 132 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Kevin Yarnell, Jose Alfredo Vazquez, Carlos Gomez, Arthur R. Siegel, Dale Weise, Mihail Slavkov, Francisco Magana, Nikola Vlaovic, Robert Gutierrez, Martin Arnaudov. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 9, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6

John H. Douglas, Bar No. 178966
[e-mail]
DOUGLAS LAW OFFICES
100 Pine Street, Suite 1250
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

MIHAIL SLAVKOV, NIKOLA
VLAOVIC, MARTIN ARNAUDOV,
DALE WEISE, KEVIN YARNELL,
CARLOS GOMEZ, FRANCISCO
MAGANA, ROBERT GUTIERREZ AND
JOSE ALFREDO VASQUEZ,
INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF
THOSE SIMILARLY SITUATED,
Plaintiffs,
v.
FAST WATER HEATER PARTNERS I,
LP DBA FAST WATER HEATER
COMPANY, A DELAWARE LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP; FWH ACQUISITION
COMPANY, LLC DBA FAST WATER
HEATER COMPANY, A DELAWARE
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY;
JEFFREY DAVID JORDAN, AN
INDIVIDUAL; AND JASON SPARKS
HANLEYBROWN, AN INDIVIDUAL,
Defendants.

Case No. CV 14-4324 JST

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
JUDGE: HON. JON S. TIGAR

23
24

PURSUANT and subject to the terms of the Settlement approved by this Court on July 25,

25

2017 and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(2), Plaintiffs MIHAIL SLAVKOV,

26

NIKOLA VLAOVIC, MARTIN ARNAUDOV, DALE WEISE, KEVIN YARNELL, CARLOS

27

GOMEZ, FRANCISCO MAGANA, ROBERT GUTIERREZ AND JOSE ALREDO VASQUEZ

28

-1DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
CASE NO. CV-14-4324 JST

1

hereby request that the Court dismiss this action with prejudice.

2
3

Dated: November 6, 2017

DOUGLAS LAW OFFICES

4
/s/ John H. Douglas
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

[PROPOSED] ORDER

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Pursuant to the settlement of the parties hereto, this action is dismissed with prejudice.
The Court will retain jurisdiction over the matter and parties for purposes of enforcing the terms
of the settlement herein.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
DATED: November __, 2017
HON. JON S. TIGAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
CASE NO. CV-14-4324 JST