Mihail Slavkov et al v. Fast Water Heater Partners I, LP et al
Filing
71
ORDER VACATING HEARING re 47 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Cause of Action in the Second Amended Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Motion filed by Jeffrey David Jordan, Fast Water Heater Partners I, LP, FWH Acquisition Company, LLC, Jason Sparks Hanleybrown. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 9, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2015)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
MIHAIL SLAVKOV, et al.,
Case No. 14-cv-04324-JST
Plaintiffs,
5
ORDER VACATING HEARING
v.
6
7
FAST WATER HEATER PARTNERS I,
LP, et al.,
8
Re: ECF No. 47
Defendants.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Cause of Action in the
10
Second Amended Complaint. ECF No. 47. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
9
Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument.
12
The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for November 19, 2015, is hereby VACATED.
13
If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date
14
of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has
15
been licensed to practice law for five or fewer years, and who has not previously presented
16
argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient
17
to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the
18
party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the
19
Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 9, 2015
_____________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?