Norton v. Santa Rosa Police Department et al
Filing
79
SCHEDULING ORDER. Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings 03/09/2016. Fact discovery cut-off 07/15/2016. Expert disclosures 8/5/2016. Expert rebuttal 8/26/2016. Expert discovery cut-off 9/9/2016. Deadline to file dispositive motions 9 /30/2016. Pretrial conference statement due 12/14/2016. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/6/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Trial set for 1/23/2017 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 24, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
HECTOR RIOJAS,
Case No. 15-cv-03592-JST
Plaintiff,
9
v.
SCHEDULING ORDER
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
et al.,
Defendants.
13
14
15
The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:
16
Event
Deadline
17
Deadline for Defendants to produce Administrative Records
3/9/2016
Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings
3/30/2016
20
Deadline to file cross-motions for summary judgment
4/20/2016
21
Opposition briefs due
6/1/2016
22
Reply briefs due
6/15/2016
Hearing on cross-motions for summary judgment
6/30/2016
18
19
23
24
Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with
25
the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.
26
The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire
27
counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely
28
1
manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their
2
calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.
3
Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are
4
disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party-
5
controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant
6
a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause
7
to grant a continuance.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 24, 2016
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
_______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?