Norton v. Santa Rosa Police Department et al

Filing 80

SCHEDULING ORDER. Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings 3/9/2016. Fact discovery cut-off 7/15/2016. Expert disclosures 8/5/2016. Expert rebuttal 8/26/2016. Expert discovery cut-off 9/9/2016. Deadline to file dispositive motions 9/30/ 2016. Pretrial conference statement due 12/14/2016. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/6/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Trial set for 1/23/2017 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 24, 2016. Correction of ECF No. 79. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 BERNARD NORTON, Case No. 14-cv-04352-JST Plaintiff, 9 v. SCHEDULING ORDER 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 SANTA ROSA POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. 12 13 14 The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10: 15 Event Deadline 16 Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings 3/9/2016 Fact discovery cut-off 7/15/2016 19 Expert disclosures 8/5/2016 20 Expert rebuttal 8/26/2016 21 Expert discovery cut-off 9/9/2016 Deadline to file dispositive motions 9/30/2016 Pretrial conference statement due 12/14/2016 Pretrial conference 1/6/2017 at 2:00 p.m. in Oakland Trial 1/23/2017 at 8:30 a.m. in San Francisco 17 18 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with the Court’s standing orders, which are available at The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 4 counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 5 manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 6 calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 7 Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party- 9 controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant 10 a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 8 to grant a continuance. 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 24, 2016 14 15 16 _______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?