Our Children's Earth Foundation et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
Filing
16
STIPULATION AND ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule for Cross Motions for Summary Judgment. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 12/5/2014. Replies due by 12/19/2014. Motion Hearing set for 1/9/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 11/19/2014. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2014)
1
2
3
MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
ALEX G. TSE (CABN 152348)
Chief, Civil Division
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ROBIN M. WALL (CABN 235690)
Assistant United States Attorney
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone: (415) 436-7071
Fax: (415) 436-6748
Robin.Wall@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Federal Defendants
11
12
UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
17
OUR CHILDREN’S EARTH
FOUNDATION, et al.,
18
Plaintiffs,
19
v.
20
21
22
23
24
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES
SERVICE, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 3:14-cv-04365-SC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
FOR CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
Hon. Samuel Conti
25
26
27
28
STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER RE MSJ BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case No.: 3:14-cv-04365-SC
1
2
WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint on October 30, 2014, and
Defendants’ answer or other response is due December 1, 2014;
3
4
WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on October 31, 2014, and
Plaintiffs’ motion is set for hearing on December 5, 2014;
5
6
7
8
9
WHEREAS Defendants’ opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion would be due on November 14,
2014;
WHEREAS Defendants requested an extension of time to oppose Plaintiffs’ motion in
order to investigate and respond to the recently filed Amended Complaint and because
Defendants’ personnel who would be involved in drafting declarations to oppose Plaintiffs’
10
motion have pre-planned vacations and competing work obligations;
11
12
13
14
15
16
WHEREAS the parties have been participating in ongoing settlement discussions
regarding Plaintiff’s pending FOIA actions; and
WHEREAS the parties have met and conferred and have agreed upon a schedule for
briefing the motion for summary judgment regarding Plaintiffs’ FOIA claims and Defendants’
anticipated cross motion and to request that the Court vacate the December 5, 2014 hearing date.
17
The parties thus stipulate, subject to the Court’s approval to the following:
18
1. On or before December 5, 2014, Defendants shall file an opposition to Plaintiffs’
19
motion and a cross-motion for summary judgment regarding Plaintiffs’ FOIA claims
20
as a single brief of no more than 25 pages;
21
2. On or before December 19, 2014, Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to Defendants’
22
motion for summary judgment and a reply in support of Plaintiffs’ motion as a single
23
brief of no more than 25 pages;
24
25
26
27
3. On or before January 2, 2015, Defendants shall file a reply in support of their crossmotion for summary judgment of no more than 15 pages.
4. The December 5, 2014 hearing for Plaintiffs’ motion should be vacated, and the
Court should set a new hearing date for the parties’ cross motions on January 9, 2015.
28
STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER RE MSJ BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case No.: 3:14-cv-04365-SC
1
1
2
Dated: November 10, 2014
Respectfully submitted,
3
MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney
4
5
/s/ Robin M. Wall
6
ROBIN M. WALL
Assistant United States Attorney
Counsel for Defendants
7
8
9
10
Dated: November 10, 2014
Respectfully submitted,
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES
11
12
/s/ Patricia Weisselberg
13
PATRICIA WEISSELBERG
Counsel for Plaintiffs
14
15
Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
Dated: November ___, 2014
18
21
S
UNIT
ED
20
RT
U
O
19
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
Hon. Samuel Conti
United States District Judge
22
26
LI
ER
A
H
25
amu
Judge S
RT
24
el Conti
NO
23
R NIA
17
FO
16
[PROPOSED] ORDER
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
27
28
STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER RE MSJ BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case No.: 3:14-cv-04365-SC
2
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?