Our Children's Earth Foundation et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule for Cross Motions for Summary Judgment. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 12/5/2014. Replies due by 12/19/2014. Motion Hearing set for 1/9/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 11/19/2014. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney ALEX G. TSE (CABN 152348) Chief, Civil Division 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ROBIN M. WALL (CABN 235690) Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, CA 94102 Phone: (415) 436-7071 Fax: (415) 436-6748 Robin.Wall@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Federal Defendants 11 12 UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 17 OUR CHILDREN’S EARTH FOUNDATION, et al., 18 Plaintiffs, 19 v. 20 21 22 23 24 NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 3:14-cv-04365-SC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Hon. Samuel Conti 25 26 27 28 STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER RE MSJ BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case No.: 3:14-cv-04365-SC 1 2 WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint on October 30, 2014, and Defendants’ answer or other response is due December 1, 2014; 3 4 WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on October 31, 2014, and Plaintiffs’ motion is set for hearing on December 5, 2014; 5 6 7 8 9 WHEREAS Defendants’ opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion would be due on November 14, 2014; WHEREAS Defendants requested an extension of time to oppose Plaintiffs’ motion in order to investigate and respond to the recently filed Amended Complaint and because Defendants’ personnel who would be involved in drafting declarations to oppose Plaintiffs’ 10 motion have pre-planned vacations and competing work obligations; 11 12 13 14 15 16 WHEREAS the parties have been participating in ongoing settlement discussions regarding Plaintiff’s pending FOIA actions; and WHEREAS the parties have met and conferred and have agreed upon a schedule for briefing the motion for summary judgment regarding Plaintiffs’ FOIA claims and Defendants’ anticipated cross motion and to request that the Court vacate the December 5, 2014 hearing date. 17 The parties thus stipulate, subject to the Court’s approval to the following: 18 1. On or before December 5, 2014, Defendants shall file an opposition to Plaintiffs’ 19 motion and a cross-motion for summary judgment regarding Plaintiffs’ FOIA claims 20 as a single brief of no more than 25 pages; 21 2. On or before December 19, 2014, Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to Defendants’ 22 motion for summary judgment and a reply in support of Plaintiffs’ motion as a single 23 brief of no more than 25 pages; 24 25 26 27 3. On or before January 2, 2015, Defendants shall file a reply in support of their crossmotion for summary judgment of no more than 15 pages. 4. The December 5, 2014 hearing for Plaintiffs’ motion should be vacated, and the Court should set a new hearing date for the parties’ cross motions on January 9, 2015. 28 STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER RE MSJ BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case No.: 3:14-cv-04365-SC 1 1 2 Dated: November 10, 2014 Respectfully submitted, 3 MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney 4 5 /s/ Robin M. Wall 6 ROBIN M. WALL Assistant United States Attorney Counsel for Defendants 7 8 9 10 Dated: November 10, 2014 Respectfully submitted, ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES 11 12 /s/ Patricia Weisselberg 13 PATRICIA WEISSELBERG Counsel for Plaintiffs 14 15 Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 Dated: November ___, 2014 18 21 S UNIT ED 20 RT U O 19 S DISTRICT TE C TA Hon. Samuel Conti United States District Judge 22 26 LI ER A H 25 amu Judge S RT 24 el Conti NO 23 R NIA 17 FO 16 [PROPOSED] ORDER N F D IS T IC T O R 27 28 STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER RE MSJ BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case No.: 3:14-cv-04365-SC 2 C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?