San Francisco Herring Association et al v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company et al

Filing 216

ORDER granting 215 STIPULATION to Reset Deadlines as to 214 MOTION to Dismiss. Responses due by 4/29/2020. Replies due by 5/13/2020. Motion Hearing reset for 5/27/2020 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor before Judge William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 4/3/2020. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2020)

G
1
2
3
4
5
6

STUART G. GROSS (#251019)
[e-mail]
TIMOTHY S. KLINE (#319227)
[e-mail]
GROSS & KLEIN LLP
The Embarcadero
Pier 9, Suite 100
San Francisco, CA 94111
t [phone]
f [phone]

7
8

Attorneys for Plaintiff Dan Clarke

9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11

GROSS & KLEIN LLP
THE EMBARCADERO
PIER 9, SUITE 100
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

12

DAN CLARKE,

13
14
15
16
17

Plaintiff,
vs.
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY; and
PG&E CORPORATION
Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-04393-WHO
JOINT STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT, TO
STRIKE AND FOR SANCTIONS
AND EXTEND TIME TO FILE
OPPOSITION AND REPLY
THERETO; [PROPOSED] ORDER

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT, TO STRIKE AND FOR SANCTIONS AND EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION AND
REPLY THERETO; [PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. 14-cv-04393-WHO

G
1

RECITALS

2

WHEREAS, on March 18, 2020, Clarke filed his Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”);

3

WHEREAS, on April 1, 2020, PG&E filed a Motion to Dismiss Clarke’s SAC, to Strike

4

and For Sanctions (“Motion to Dismiss”), and set a hearing for May 7, 2020;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, Clarke’s opposition to the Motion to Dismiss

5
6

would be due on April 15, 2020, and PG&E’s reply would be due on April 22, 2020; and
WHEREAS, the Parties agree to a two-week extension of Clarke’s time to oppose the

7
8

Motion to Dismiss and a one-week extension of PG&E’s time to reply; and

9
10

WHEREAS, the undersigned counsel for Defendants has consented to the undersigned
counsel for Plaintiff signing the instant stipulation on his behalf.

11

GROSS & KLEIN LLP
THE EMBARCADERO
PIER 9, SUITE 100
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

12

NOW, THEREFORE, Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(b), the Parties stipulate and agree
as follows, subject to the Court’s approval:

13
14

STIPULATION
1. Clarke will file his Opposition to PG&E’s Motion to Dismiss on or before April 29,

15
16

2020;

17

2. PG&E will file its Reply in support of Motion to Dismiss on or before May 13, 2020;

18

3. The May 7, 2020 hearing on PG&E’s Motion to Dismiss is hereby continued to May

19

28, 2020 at 10:30 a.m., or the Court’s next available date.

20
21

DATED: April 3, 2020

WFBM, LLP

22
23
24
25

By:__/s/ Scott D. Mroz_______________________
SCOTT D. MROZ
ATTORNEYS FOR PACIFIC GAS AND
ELECTRIC COMPANY AND PG&E
CORPORATION

26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT, TO STRIKE AND FOR SANCTIONS AND EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION AND
REPLY THERETO; [PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. 14-cv-04393-WHO

1

G
1

DATED: April 3, 2020

GROSS & KLEIN LLP

2
By:__/s/ Stuart G. Gross____________________
STUART G. GROSS
ATTORNEYS FOR DAN CLARKE

3
4
5
6
7

ORDER

8
9
10

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, as modified IT IS SO ORDERED. The hearing will be
on May 27, 2020 at 2:00 p.m.

11

GROSS & KLEIN LLP
THE EMBARCADERO
PIER 9, SUITE 100
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

12

Dated: April 3, 2020

______________________________________
The Honorable Judge William H. Orrick

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT, TO STRIKE AND FOR SANCTIONS AND EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION AND
REPLY THERETO; [PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. 14-cv-04393-WHO

2