Marci Patera v. Citibank, N.A. et al
Filing
19
Modified ORDER granting 18 Stipulation to extend deadline for opposition to MTD filed by Marci Patera. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 12/16/2014. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2014)
1 Law Offices of Peter L. Kutrubes
Peter L. Kutrubes, SBN 176024
2 Stephen P. Lin, SBN 201150
3 1415 Oakland Boulevard, Suite 102
Walnut Creek, California 94596
4 Telephone: (925) 939-9600
Facsimile: (925) 256-7660
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff Marci Patera
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
MARCI PATERA,
11
Case No.: 3:14-cv-04533-JSC
Plaintiff,
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE TO
MOTION TO DISMISS AND REPLY TO
SAME
vs.
12
14
CITIBANK, N.A., a national banking
association; CITIMORTGAGE, Inc., a
corporation; et al., and Does 1-25,
15
Defendants.
13
Date: January 8, 2015
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Place: F, 15th Floor
16
17
18
19
extend
20
21
22
Plaintiff MARCI PATERA (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants CITIBANK, N.A. and
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. (“Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate
23
and agree as follows:
24
25
26
27
1. WHEREAS, on or about December 1, 2014, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss
Plaintiff’s Complaint and all supporting documents (hereinafter “MTD”);
2. WHEREAS, the hearing date for the MTD has currently been scheduled for January 8,
28
1
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE ON RESPONSE TO MTD
1
2015, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom F of this court, before the Honorable Magistrate Judge
2
Jacqueline Scott Corley;
3
3. WHEREAS, the Response to the MTD is currently due to be filed by Plaintiff on or before
4
Monday, December 15, 2014;
5
4. WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel has a conflict with other client work on December 15,
6
2014;
7
5. WHEREAS, Defendants’ counsel and Plaintiff’s counsel have agreed that extending the
8
deadline for the filing of Plaintiff’s Response to the MTD for two (2) days to accommodate
9
10
Plaintiff’s counsel’s workload will not prejudice the rights of any of the parties or hinder
11
the effective administration of this case.
12
13
IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among Plaintiff and
14
Defendants, as follows:
15
1. The deadline for Plaintiff’s response to the MTD shall be extended, upon the agreement
16
17
and consent of the court, from December 15, 2014 to December 17, 2014;
18
2. Accordingly, the deadline for Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Response to the MTD shall
19
be extended from December 22, 2014 to December 24, 2014.
20
3. The parties will, through the filing of this Joint Stipulation, petition the court for
21
permission to extend the deadlines for Plaintiff’s Response to the MTD and Defendants’
22
23
24 //
//
//
//
//
25
26
//
27
28 2 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE ON RESPONSE TO MTD
DISMISS
1
Reply to Plaintiff’s Response to the MTD, accordingly.
2
3
DATED: 12/15/14
/s/ Stephen Lin_________________________
STEPHEN P. LIN, Of Counsel
LAW OFFICES OF PETER L. KUTRUBES
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARCI PATERA
DATED: 12/15/2014
/s/ Cuong Nguyen
___________________
CUONG M. NGUYEN
PITE DUNCAN, LLP
Attorneys for Defendants
CITIBANK, N.A. and CITIMORTGAGE,
INC.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
The hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is continued to January 15, 2015 at 8:30 a.m.
Plaintiff shall file their consent or declination by December 17, 2014.
15
16
NO
21
RT
ER
eline Sc
H
22
c qu
Judge Ja
23
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
24
25
26
27
28 3 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE ON RESPONSE TO MTD
DISMISS
ott Corl
ey
R NIA
20
TED
GRAN
FO
S
UNIT
ED
19
RT
U
O
18
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
LI
Dated: December 16, 2014
A
17
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?