Gallagher et al v. Bayer AG et al
Filing
84
ORDER granting 83 STIPULATION on Case Management Conference Date. Case Management Conference continued to 12/8/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 12/1/2015. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/30/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Jonathan F. Cohn (admitted pro hac vice)
jcohn@sidley.com
Cara R. Viglucci López (admitted pro hac vice)
cvigluccilopez@sidley.com
Paul J. Ray (admitted pro hac vice)
paul.ray@sidley.com
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
1501 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: (202) 736.8000
Facsimile: (202) 736.8711
Eugene A. Schoon (admitted pro hac vice)
eschoon@sidley.com
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
One South Dearborn
Chicago, IL 60603
Telephone: (312) 853.7279
Facsimile: (312) 853.7036
Ryan Sandrock (SBN 251781)
rsandrock@sidley.com
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 California Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 772.1200
Facsimile: (415) 772.7400
Attorneys for Defendants
Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation, and Bayer HealthCare LLC
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19
20
21
COLLEEN GALLAGHER, ILANA FARAR,
ANDREA LOPEZ, JOANN CORDARO, and
ROSANNE COSGROVE, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated,
24
25
26
27
STIPULATION AND ORDER ON CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE
Plaintiffs,
22
23
Case No. 14-cv-04601-WHO
v.
BAYER AG, BAYER CORPORATION, and
BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC,
Defendants.
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER ON CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE – CASE NO. 14-04601-WHO
1
2
3
4
On October 21, 2015, the Clerk of Court issued a notice setting a case management
conference for November 24, 2015. In light of the Thanksgiving holidays, Plaintiffs and Defendants
have stipulated and agreed to change the date of this case management conference to December 8,
2015, at a time and place of the Court’s convenience.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Dated: October 27, 2015
KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP
Dated: October 27, 2015
By: /s/ Laurence D. King
By: /s/ Jonathan F. Cohn
Laurence D. King (SBN 206423)
lking@kaplanfox.com
Linda M. Fong (SBN 124232)
lfong@kaplanfox.com
350 Sansome Street, Suite 400
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 772-4700
Facsimile: (415) 772-4707
Jonathan F. Cohn (admitted pro hac vice)
jcohn@sidley.com
Cara R. Viglucci López (admitted pro hac vice)
cvigluccilopez@sidley.com
Paul J. Ray (admitted pro hac vice)
paul.ray@sidley.com
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
1501 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: (202) 736.8000
Facsimile: (202) 736.8711
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
-and-
20
KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP
Robert N. Kaplan (admitted pro hac vice)
rkaplan@kaplanfox.com
Lauren I. Dubick (admitted pro hac vice)
ldubick@kaplanfox.com
850 Third Avenue, 14th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Telephone: (212) 687-1980
Facsimile: (212) 687-7714
21
-and-
16
17
18
19
22
23
24
25
26
Eugene A. Schoon (admitted pro hac vice)
eschoon@sidley.com
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
One South Dearborn
Chicago, IL 60603
Telephone: (312) 853.7279
Facsimile: (312) 853.7036
STANLEY LAW GROUP
Stephen Henry Gardner (admitted pro hac vice)
steve@consumerhelper.com
Amanda M. Howell (admitted pro hac vice)
ahowell@stanleylawgroup.com
6116 N. Central Expressway, Suite 1500
Dallas, Texas 75206
Telephone: (214) 443-4316
Facsimile: (214) 447-9469
Ryan Sandrock (SBN 251781)
rsandrock@sidley.com
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 California Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 772.1200
Facsimile: (415) 772.7400
27
28
(1)
STIPULATION AND ORDER ON CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE – CASE NO. 14-04601-WHO
1
2
3
4
5
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
Dated: October 30, 2015
_________________________
The Honorable William H. Orrick
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(2)
STIPULATION AND ORDER ON CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE – CASE NO. 14-04601-WHO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?